ReviewDer Internist2007
[Ileo pouch-anal anastomosis].
Review in Der Internist, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the treatment of choice in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis requiring surgical therapy. Pouchitis is the most frequent complication, occurring in up to 50% of patients with underlying UC. Clinical symptoms of the disease are non-specific. Moreover, surgical complications must be differentiated from idiopathic pouchitis using pouchoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound or MRI of the pelvis in certain cases. The therapy for idiopathic pouchitis, its etiology and pathophysiology being unclear, is based on antibiotic treatment, usually with metronidazole or ciprofloxacin. Probiotics such as VSL#3 can be used to prevent relapse. In summary, the clinical and functional outcomes are excellent and stable for 20 years after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.