Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17392502›Full record

ArticleBlood2007

Sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis protects against cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a cohort analysis.

Francisco M Marty, Julie Bryar, Sarah K Browne, Talya Schwarzberg, Vincent T Ho, Ingrid V Bassett, John Koreth, Edwin P Alyea, Robert J Soiffer, Corey S Cutler and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Oral Brincidofovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Moving Past Ganciclovir and Foscarnet: Advances in CMV Therapy.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco M MartyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Boston, MA 02115, USA. fmarty@partners.org
Julie Bryar
Sarah K Browne
Talya Schwarzberg
Vincent T Ho
Ingrid V Bassett
John Koreth
Edwin P Alyea
Robert J Soiffer
Corey S Cutler
Joseph H Antin
Lindsey R Baden
Harvard University · USOffice of Infectious Diseases · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Novel Approaches to GHVD PreventionP01HL070149 · NHLBI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI LEE, STEPHANIE J · 2003 to 2007
$10.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL070149NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL070149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in organ transplantation have been associated with a lower than expected incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Whether sirolimus has a similar effect on CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is not known. We evaluated 606 patients who underwent HSCT between April 2000 and June 2004 to identify risk factors for CMV reactivation 100 days after transplantation. The cohort included 252 patients who received sirolimus-tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis; the rest received non-sirolimus-based regimens. An initial positive CMV DNA hybrid capture assay was observed in 225 patients (37.1%) at a median 39 days after HSCT for an incidence rate of 0.50 cases/100 patient-days (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.57). Multivariable Cox modeling adjusting for CMV donor-recipient serostatus pairs, incident acute GVHD, as well as other important covariates, confirmed a significant reduction in CMV reactivation associated with sirolimus-tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis, with an adjusted HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .004). The adjusted HR was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.55; P = .001) when persistent CMV viremia was modeled. Tacrolimus use without sirolimus was not significantly protective in either model (adjusted HR, 0.66; P = .14 and P = .35, respectively). The protective effect of sirolimus-containing GVHD prophylaxis regimens on CMV reactivation should be confirmed in randomized trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesCytomegalovirus InfectionsFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLeukemiaMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID17392502
PMCPMC1924486
OpenAlexW2011660868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.