ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2007
Treatment options for biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.
Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrahepatic bilioenteric anastomosis after biliary complications of liver transplantation: operative rescue of surgical failures.World journal of surgery · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With improved techniques and experience in endoscopic and percutaneous transhepatic biliary procedures, the initial management of biliary complications after liver transplantation has become increasingly nonoperative in nature. Although no prospective randomized trials that formally compare nonoperative and operative therapy for post-transplant biliary complications have been performed, numerous case series and other descriptive studies have demonstrated that nonoperative therapies can be as effective as surgical therapy, and the less invasive nature of the endoscopic and percutaneous techniques make them the preferred initial therapy of choice in selected circumstances. Indeed, for small biliary leaks and early anastomotic strictures, nonoperative management has become the initial therapy of choice, with operative intervention being reserved for cases in which the endoscopic or percutaneous approach fails to resolve the underlying complication. Despite the increasing use of endoscopic or percutaneous treatment modalities to treat post-transplant biliary complication, operative intervention remains a potential definitive therapy for most complications and generally results in the most durable outcomes with the least need for reintervention. Operative intervention is still the treatment of choice for significant biliary anastomotic disruptions, massive biliary leaks, or any biliary complication that is associated with severe intra-abdominal or systemic infection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.