Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17391623›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2007

Treatment options for biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.

John E Scarborough, Dev M Desai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John E Scarborough
Dev M Desai
Bell (Canada) · CADuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With improved techniques and experience in endoscopic and percutaneous transhepatic biliary procedures, the initial management of biliary complications after liver transplantation has become increasingly nonoperative in nature. Although no prospective randomized trials that formally compare nonoperative and operative therapy for post-transplant biliary complications have been performed, numerous case series and other descriptive studies have demonstrated that nonoperative therapies can be as effective as surgical therapy, and the less invasive nature of the endoscopic and percutaneous techniques make them the preferred initial therapy of choice in selected circumstances. Indeed, for small biliary leaks and early anastomotic strictures, nonoperative management has become the initial therapy of choice, with operative intervention being reserved for cases in which the endoscopic or percutaneous approach fails to resolve the underlying complication. Despite the increasing use of endoscopic or percutaneous treatment modalities to treat post-transplant biliary complication, operative intervention remains a potential definitive therapy for most complications and generally results in the most durable outcomes with the least need for reintervention. Operative intervention is still the treatment of choice for significant biliary anastomotic disruptions, massive biliary leaks, or any biliary complication that is associated with severe intra-abdominal or systemic infection.

Identifiers

PMID17391623
OpenAlexW2085070340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.