Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17391515›Full record

ReviewMolecular pain2007

Techniques for assessing knee joint pain in arthritis.

Volker Neugebauer, Jeong S Han, Hita Adwanikar, Yu Fu, Guangchen Ji

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pain, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fatty-Acid-RichMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Volker NeugebauerDepartment of Neuroscience & Cell Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1069, USA. voneugeb@utmb.edu
Jeong S Han
Hita Adwanikar
Yu Fu
Guangchen Ji
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

VISCERAL PAINP01NS011255 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI HULSEBOSCH, CLAIRE E · 1985 to 2012
$13.6M
PAIN, NOCICEPTION, AND THE AMYGDALAR01NS038261 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI Volker Neugebauer, Igor Ponomarev · 1999 to 2026
$8.7M
NINDS NIH HHS NS11255NINDS NIH HHS NS38261NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS011255NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of pain is of critical importance for mechanistic studies as well as for the validation of drug targets. This review will focus on knee joint pain associated with arthritis. Different animal models have been developed for the study of knee joint arthritis. Behavioral tests in animal models of knee joint arthritis typically measure knee joint pain rather indirectly. In recent years, however, progress has been made in the development of tests that actually evaluate the sensitivity of the knee joint in arthritis models. They include measurements of the knee extension angle struggle threshold, hind limb withdrawal reflex threshold of knee compression force, and vocalizations in response to stimulation of the knee. A discussion of pain assessment in humans with arthritis pain conditions concludes this review.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsArthritisArthritis, RheumatoidBehavior, AnimalGaitHot TemperatureHumansKnee JointMotor ActivityOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPostureRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID17391515
PMCPMC1851005
OpenAlexW2171046955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.