Trial reportBMC medical research methodology2007
Recruitment and retention in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Bell's palsy: a case study.
Trial report in BMC medical research methodology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Who can we reach and who can we keep? Predictors of intervention engagement and adherence in a cluster randomized controlled trial in South Africa.BMC public health · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Recruitment strategies in two reproductive medicine network infertility trials.Contemporary clinical trials · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Identifying strategies to maximise recruitment and retention of practices and patients in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intervention to optimise secondary prevention for coronary heart disease in primary care.BMC medical research methodology · 2009Trial
- Primary care perspectives on implementation of clinical trial recruitment.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- [Strategies to reduce patient loss during the follow-up period of randomized trials].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Review
- Recruiting patients and collecting data for an observational study using computerised record pop-up prompts: the PROG-RES study.Primary health care research & development · 2013Article
- Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2013Article
- Article
- Process evaluation of recruitment for a cancer screening trial in primary care.Health promotion practice · 2011Article
- Using a business model approach and marketing techniques for recruitment to clinical trials.Trials · 2011Review
- Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of physicians and practices for primary care health services research at one centre.BMC medical research methodology · 2010Article
- Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions.BMC medicine · 2010Article
- Trials within trials? Researcher, funder and ethical perspectives on the practicality and acceptability of nesting trials of recruitment methods in existing primary care trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2010Article
- Recruiting older people to a randomised controlled dietary intervention trial--how hard can it be?BMC medical research methodology · 2010Article
- Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical framework.BMC medical research methodology · 2009Article
- Challenges in conducting research on collaborative mental health care: a qualitative study.CMAJ openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is notoriously difficult to recruit patients to randomised controlled trials in primary care. This is particularly true when the disease process under investigation occurs relatively infrequently and must be investigated during a brief time window. Bell's palsy, an acute unilateral paralysis of the facial nerve is just such a relatively rare condition. In this case study we describe the organisational issues presented in setting up a large randomised controlled trial of the management of Bell's palsy across primary and secondary care in Scotland and how we managed to successfully recruit and retain patients presenting in the community.
methodsWhere possible we used existing evidence on recruitment strategies to maximise recruitment and retention. We consider that the key issues in the success of this study were; the fact that the research was seen as clinically important by the clinicians who had initial responsibility for recruitment; employing an experienced trial co-ordinator and dedicated researchers willing to recruit participants seven days per week and to visit them at home at a time convenient to them, hence reducing missed patients and ensuring they were retained in the study; national visibility and repeated publicity at a local level delivered by locally based principal investigators well known to their primary care community; encouraging recruitment by payment to practices and reducing the workload of the referring doctors by providing immediate access to specialist care; good collaboration between primary and secondary care and basing local investigators in the otolarnygology trial centres
resultsAlthough the recruitment rate did not meet our initial expectations, enhanced retention meant that we exceeded our planned target of recruiting 550 patients within the planned time-scale.
conclusionWhile difficult, recruitment to and retention within multi-centre trials from primary care can be successfully achieved through the application of the best available evidence, establishing good relationships with practices, minimising the workload of those involved in recruitment and offering enhanced care to all participants. Primary care trialists should describe their experiences of the methods used to persuade patients to participate in their trials when publishing their results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.