ArticleHeart and vessels2007
Simultaneous echocardiographic evaluation of coronary flow velocity reserve and aortic distensibility indices in hypertension.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low total antioxidative capacity levels are associated with augmentation index but not pulse-wave velocity.Heart and vessels · 2009Article
- Echocardiographic evaluation and clinical implications of aortic stiffness and coronary flow reserve and their relation.Clinical cardiology · 2008Review
- Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve and aortic distensibility indices in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.Heart and vessels · 2008Article
- Insulin resistance functionally limits endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation in nondiabetic patients.Heart and vessels · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), a measure of endothelial function in coronary circulation, can be measured semi-invasively in the left anterior descending coronary artery by using stress transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). During the same stress TEE, aortic distensibility indices (elastic modulus [E(p)] and Young's circumferential static elastic modulus [E(s)]) can be assessed. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether stress TEE is valuable method for parallel evaluation of CFVR, E(p), and E(s) in patients with hypertension. A total of 38 patients with chest pain but with a negative coronary angiogram were enrolled into the present study, which included examination of the presence or absence of hypertension. Significant coronary stenosis was considered present in the event of a luminal diameter reduction of >50% on use of the "worst view method." Patients with significant coronary or valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, or diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. Stress TEE was performed in each case to evaluate CFVR, E(p), and E(s). Coronary flow velocity reserve and diastolic coronary flow velocities measured at peak stress were decreased in hypertensive patients as compared with normotensive subjects. E(p) and E(s) were significantly increased in hypertensive patients. In conclusion, it can be stated that Stress TEE is a useful tool for the simultaneous evaluation of the CFVR, E(p), and E(s) in hypertension. The CFVR and aortic distensibility are decreased in hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.