Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17390096›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2007

Clinical neuroanatomy module 5 years' experience at the School of Medicine of Padova.

Veronica Macchi, Andrea Porzionato, Carla Stecco, Anna Parenti, Raffaele De Caro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Teaching medical anatomy: what is the role of imaging today?Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veronica MacchiSection of Anatomy, Department of Human Anatomy and Physiology, University of Padova, Via A. Gabelli 65, 35127, Padova, Italy, rdecaro@unipd.it.
Andrea Porzionato
Carla Stecco
Anna Parenti
Raffaele De Caro
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroscopic anatomy of the brain is scheduled during the last meeting of the Short Course of Dissection, an optional course for second-year medical students at the School of Medicine of Padova, following the official 44 h of lectures of Neuroanatomy. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the value of brain dissection in retention of neuroanatomical knowledge by medical students. An anatomical questionnaire was given to second-year students in the years 2002-2006, aiming at evaluating their initial neuroanatomical background. Administered twice, at the beginning and end of the last meeting of the optional course, the questionnaire consisted of three diagrams, showing the base, the convexity of the brain, and an axial section of the cerebrum. For each diagram, ten anatomical structures were selected, according to their clinical importance. Students then followed a worksheet for external examination of the brain and cutting. The teacher presented three examples of pathologies causing elevated intracranial pressure, and indicated their locations on the relative cerebral structures. At the end of the meeting, the same questionnaire was given again. To evaluate long-term retention of information, it was also given to third-year students. The questionnaire revealed improved knowledge of neuroanatomy in a mean of 57% of students, especially as regards the axial section (72%), with respect to that of the brain base (43%) and convexity (40%). After 1 year, long-term assessment of information retention showed that 65% of the group which had followed the dissection course correctly answered with respect to the control group (40%), and even better (87.5%) as regards anatomical details presented in their clinical aspects. The main guidelines in planning the clinical neuroanatomy module were: (1) selection of anatomical landmarks of importance from the clinical viewpoint; (2) identification of pathologies which involve the above anatomical landmarks; (3) relationships between morphology and pathology enhancing anatomo-clinical importance.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateDissectionEducational MeasurementHumansItalyNeuroanatomySchools, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID17390096
OpenAlexW2128578179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.