ArticlePloS one2007
Clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray analysis: summary of 2513 postnatal cases.
Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.
- Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2010Guideline
- Diagnostic and prognostic role of soft ultrasound markers in prenatal detection and assessment of foetal abnormalities.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2024Review
- Optical Genome Mapping Identifies a Novel Unbalanced Translocation Between Chromosomes 4q and 6q Leading to Feeding Difficulties and Hypotonia in a Neonate: A Case Report.The application of clinical genetics · 2024Article
- An ethical analysis of divergent clinical approaches to the application of genetic testing for autism and schizophrenia.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Emerging technologies for prenatal diagnosis: The application of whole genome and RNA sequencing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2022Review
- Whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier diagnostic framework for rare genetic diseases.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021Review
- 17p13.3 Microduplication Syndrome: Further Delineating the Clinical Spectrum.Journal of pediatric genetics · 2021Article
- Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Genomic imbalances defining novel intellectual disability associated loci.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Article
- A comprehensive clinical and genetic study in 127 patients with ID in Kinshasa, DR Congo.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2018Article
- The Genomic Health of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Genomic Instability and the Consequences on Nuclear Organization.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Application of array comparative genomic hybridization in Korean children under 6 years old with global developmental delay.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2017Article
- A novel microduplication of ARID1B: Clinical, genetic, and proteomic findings.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2017Article
- Emerging genotype-phenotype relationships in patients with large NF1 deletions.Human genetics · 2017Review
- Exceptional complex chromosomal rearrangements in three generations.Case reports in genetics · 2015Article
- Copy number variants prioritization after array-CGH analysis - a cohort of 1000 patients.Molecular cytogenetics · 2015Article
- Double inv(3)(q21q26.2) in acute myeloid leukemia is resulted from an acquired copy neutral loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 3q and associated with disease progression.Molecular cytogenetics · 2015Article
- Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted, high-resolution aCGH in 10,362 consecutive cases.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014Article
- Considering specific clinical features as evidence of pathogenic copy number variants.Journal of applied genetics · 2014Article
- Dysmorphology at a distance: results of a web-based diagnostic service.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArray Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool to detect genomic imbalances and study disease mechanism and pathogenesis. We report our experience with the clinical implementation of this high resolution human genome analysis, referred to as Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA). METHODS AND
findingsCMA was performed clinically on 2513 postnatal samples from patients referred with a variety of clinical phenotypes. The initial 775 samples were studied using CMA array version 4 and the remaining 1738 samples were analyzed with CMA version 5 containing expanded genomic coverage. Overall, CMA identified clinically relevant genomic imbalances in 8.5% of patients: 7.6% using V4 and 8.9% using V5. Among 117 cases referred for additional investigation of a known cytogenetically detectable rearrangement, CMA identified the majority (92.5%) of the genomic imbalances. Importantly, abnormal CMA findings were observed in 5.2% of patients (98/1872) with normal karyotypes/FISH results, and V5, with expanded genomic coverage, enabled a higher detection rate in this category than V4. For cases without cytogenetic results available, 8.0% (42/524) abnormal CMA results were detected; again, V5 demonstrated an increased ability to detect abnormality. Improved diagnostic potential of CMA is illustrated by 90 cases identified with 51 cryptic microdeletions and 39 predicted apparent reciprocal microduplications in 13 specific chromosomal regions associated with 11 known genomic disorders. In addition, CMA identified copy number variations (CNVs) of uncertain significance in 262 probands; however, parental studies usually facilitated clinical interpretation. Of these, 217 were interpreted as familial variants and 11 were determined to be de novo; the remaining 34 await parental studies to resolve the clinical significance.
conclusionsThis large set of clinical results demonstrates the significantly improved sensitivity of CMA for the detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances and highlights the need for comprehensive genetic counseling to facilitate accurate clinical correlation and interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.