Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17389753›Full record

Trial reportThorax2007

Effects on patients with asthma of eradicating visible indoor mould: a randomised controlled trial.

M L Burr, I P Matthews, R A Arthur, H L Watson, C J Gregory, F D J Dunstan, S R Palmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dehumidifiers for chronic asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Enhancing ventilation in homes of children with asthma: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Mold exposure and rhinitis symptoms among children attending Head Start centers in New York City.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Housing Quality Improvement and Health Care Utilization: A Regression Discontinuity Study.Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management] · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Impact of Air Pollution on Asthma Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  17. The Indoor Environment and Childhood Asthma.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M L BurrDepartment of Epidemiology, Statistics and Public Health, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK. burrml@cf.ac.uk
I P Matthews
R A Arthur
H L Watson
C J Gregory
F D J Dunstan
S R Palmer
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not clear whether associations between respiratory symptoms and indoor mould are causal. A randomised controlled trial was conducted to see whether asthma improves when indoor mould is removed.

methodsHouses of patients with asthma were randomly allocated into two groups. In one group, indoor mould was removed, fungicide was applied and a fan was installed in the loft. In the control group, intervention was delayed for 12 months. Questionnaires were administered and peak expiratory flow rate was measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.

resultsEighty-one houses were allocated to the intervention group and 83 to the control group; 95 participants in 68 intervention houses and 87 in 63 control houses supplied follow-up information. Peak expiratory flow rate variability declined in both groups, with no significant differences between them. At 6 months, significantly more of the intervention group showed a net improvement in wheeze affecting activities (difference between groups 25%, 95% CI 3% to 47%; p = 0.028), perceived improvement of breathing (52%, 95% CI 30% to 74%; p<0.0001) and perceived reduction in medication (59%, 95% CI 35% to 81%; p<0.0001). By 12 months the intervention group showed significantly greater reductions than the controls in preventer and reliever use, and more improvement in rhinitis (24%, 95% CI 9% to 39%; p = 0.001) and rhinoconjunctivitis (20%, 95% CI 5% to 36%; p = 0.009).

conclusionsAlthough there was no objective evidence of benefit, symptoms of asthma and rhinitis improved and medication use declined following removal of indoor mould. It is unlikely that this was entirely a placebo effect.

Indexed as

Air ConditioningAir Pollution, IndoorFungiAdultAsthmaFemaleHousehold ArticlesHousingHumansHumidityMaleRespirationTemperature

Identifiers

PMID17389753
PMCPMC2117320
OpenAlexW2119104852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.