Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17389536›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysis.

Bradley N Gaynes, A John Rush, Madhukar H Trivedi, Stephen R Wisniewski, G K Balasubramani, Donald C Spencer, Timothy Petersen, Michael Klinkman, Diane Warden, Linda Nicholas and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. From Stress to Synapse: The Neuronal Atrophy Pathway to Mood Dysregulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bradley N GaynesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7160, USA. bngaynes@med.unc.edu
A John Rush
Madhukar H Trivedi
Stephen R Wisniewski
G K Balasubramani
Donald C Spencer
Timothy Petersen
Michael Klinkman
Diane Warden
Linda Nicholas
Maurizio Fava
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSIONN01MH90003 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · 2007 to 2008
$9.1M
TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION-278990003N01MH090003 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · 1999 to 2003
–
NIMH NIH HHS MH01951-03NIMH NIH HHS N01MH90003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe undertook a study to confirm and extend preliminary findings that participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care and specialty care settings have with equivalent degrees of depression severity and an indistinguishable constellation of symptoms.

methodsBaseline data were collected for a distinct validation cohort of 2,541 participants (42% primary care) from 14 US regional centers comprised of 41 clinic sites (18 primary care, 23 specialty care). Participants met broadly inclusive eligibility criteria requiring a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of MDD and a minimum depressive symptom score on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The main outcome measures were the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology--Clinician Rated and the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire.

resultsPrimary care and specialty care participants had identical levels of moderately severe depression and identical distributions of depressive severity scores. Both primary care and specialty care participants showed considerable suicide risk, with specialty care participants even more likely to report prior suicide attempts. Core depressive symptoms or concurrent psychiatric disorders were not substantially different between settings. One half of participants in each setting had an anxiety disorder (48.6% primary care vs 51.6% specialty care, P = .143), with social phobia being the most common (25.3% primary care vs 32.1% specialty care, P = .002).

conclusionsFor outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD, depressive symptoms and severity vary little between primary care and specialty care settings. In this large, broadly inclusive US sample, the risk factors for chronic and recurrent depressive illness were frequently present, highlighting a clear risk for treatment resistance and the need for aggressive management strategies in both settings.

Indexed as

AdultAge DistributionChronic DiseaseComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHealth StatusHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRacial Groups

Identifiers

PMID17389536
PMCPMC1838683
OpenAlexW2124612158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.