Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17389037›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2007

Novel markers for differentiation of lobular and ductal invasive breast carcinomas by laser microdissection and microarray analysis.

Gulisa Turashvili, Jan Bouchal, Karl Baumforth, Wenbin Wei, Marta Dziechciarkova, Jiri Ehrmann, Jiri Klein, Eduard Fridman, Jozef Skarda, Josef Srovnal and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
208citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

208 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 389 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epigenetics · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gulisa TurashviliLaboratory of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. guliat@gmail.com <guliat@gmail.com>
Jan Bouchal
Karl Baumforth
Wenbin Wei
Marta Dziechciarkova
Jiri Ehrmann
Jiri Klein
Eduard Fridman
Jozef Skarda
Josef Srovnal
Marian Hajduch
Paul Murray
Zdenek Kolar
Palacký University Olomouc · CZCancer Research UK · GBSheba Medical Center · ILUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Increasing CRC Screening in Primary Care SettingsR01NR008425 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MENON, USHA · 2004 to 2007
$2.0M
Impact of Changes in Circadian Rhythms in Pediatrics ICUF31NR007844 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CARNO, MARGARET-ANN · 2001 to 2002
$31k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR007844NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive ductal and lobular carcinomas (IDC and ILC) are the most common histological types of breast cancer. Clinical follow-up data and metastatic patterns suggest that the development and progression of these tumors are different. The aim of our study was to identify gene expression profiles of IDC and ILC in relation to normal breast epithelial cells.

methodsWe examined 30 samples (normal ductal and lobular cells from 10 patients, IDC cells from 5 patients, ILC cells from 5 patients) microdissected from cryosections of ten mastectomy specimens from postmenopausal patients. Fifty nanograms of total RNA were amplified and labeled by PCR and in vitro transcription. Samples were analysed upon Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Arrays. The expression of seven differentially expressed genes (CDH1, EMP1, DDR1, DVL1, KRT5, KRT6, KRT17) was verified by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Expression of ASPN mRNA was validated by in situ hybridization on frozen sections, and CTHRC1, ASPN and COL3A1 were tested by PCR.

resultsUsing GCOS pairwise comparison algorithm and rank products we have identified 84 named genes common to ILC versus normal cell types, 74 named genes common to IDC versus normal cell types, 78 named genes differentially expressed between normal ductal and lobular cells, and 28 named genes between IDC and ILC. Genes distinguishing between IDC and ILC are involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, TGF-beta and Wnt signaling. These changes were present in both tumor types but appeared to be more prominent in ILC. Immunohistochemistry for several novel markers (EMP1, DVL1, DDR1) distinguished large sets of IDC from ILC.

conclusionIDC and ILC can be differentiated both at the gene and protein levels. In this study we report two candidate genes, asporin (ASPN) and collagen triple helix repeat containing 1 (CTHRC1) which might be significant in breast carcinogenesis. Besides E-cadherin, the proteins validated on tissue microarrays (EMP1, DVL1, DDR1) may represent novel immunohistochemical markers helpful in distinguishing between IDC and ILC. Further studies with larger sets of patients are needed to verify the gene expression profiles of various histological types of breast cancer in order to determine molecular subclassifications, prognosis and the optimum treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiomarkersBreastBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCollagen Type IIIExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationLasersMicrodissectionTissue Array AnalysisASPN protein, humanBiomarkersCadherinsCOL3A1 protein, humanCollagen Type IIICTHRC1 protein, humanExtracellular Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17389037
PMCPMC1852112
OpenAlexW2028395883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.