Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17387463›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Identification of asthmatic children using prescription data and diagnosis.

Grete Moth, Peter Vedsted, Po Schiøtz

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Neonatal vitamin D status and asthma risk after age 5 years: A Danish population-based cohort study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Trends in childhood asthma in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of the Consumption of Drugs Prescribed for the Treatment of Asthma in Belgian Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grete MothDanish Paediatric Asthma Centre, Aarhus University Hospital - Skejby Sygehus, Aarhus N, Denmark. gmot@svf.au.dk
Peter Vedsted
Po Schiøtz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to develop and validate a method for identifying asthmatic children between 6 and 14 years of age based on prescription data on anti-asthmatic drugs and diagnostic data.

methodsA register-based study of 125,907 Danish children aged 6-14 years identified 9695 children who had redeemed at least one anti-asthmatic drug prescription in 2002. The asthma diagnosis in these children was validated by discharge information and by a questionnaire completed by general practitioners. Models based on combinations of different types of drugs were tested to find the best model that would include as many children as possible with a validated diagnosis and exclude as many false positives as possible. Different time windows were tested in terms of detecting the children and the observation period of refilling prescriptions.

resultsThe highest specificity of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.84-0.87] together with a sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.62-0.65) were found in the model that included children who had redeemed a prescription for any anti-asthmatic drug - with the exception of prescriptions for beta2-agonists as liquid, one prescription only of inhaled beta2-agonist or an inhaled steroid - during a 12-month period. Lengthening the observation time by 6 months did not significantly improve the specificity (0.87; 95% CI: 0.85-0.88), but it did result in a statistically significantly lower sensitivity (0.59; 95% CI: 0.58-0.60).

conclusionRegister-based data on redeemed prescriptions can be utilised to identify asthmatic school children. This method will be useful in health services research and in the proactive care of asthmatic children.

Indexed as

AsthmaMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAnti-Asthmatic AgentsChildCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDenmarkDrug Information ServicesDrug PrescriptionsFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.