Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17387383›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2007

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging small (up to 15 mm) breast carcinomas. Results from a European multi-institutional study.

Gábor Cserni, Simonetta Bianchi, Vania Vezzosi, Riccardo Arisio, Rita Bori, Johannes L Peterse, Anna Sapino, Isabella Castellano, Maria Drijkoningen, Janina Kulka and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Gábor CserniDepartment of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, H-6000, Hungary. cserni@freemail.hu
Simonetta Bianchi
Vania Vezzosi
Riccardo Arisio
Rita Bori
Johannes L Peterse
Anna Sapino
Isabella Castellano
Maria Drijkoningen
Janina Kulka
Vincenzo Eusebi
Maria P Foschini
Jean-Pierre Bellocq
Cristi Marin
Sten Thorstenson
Isabel Amendoeira
Angelika Reiner-Concin
Thomas Decker
Manuela Lacerda
Paulo Figueiredo
Gábor Fejes
Bács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház · HUHôpital d'Hautepierre · FRInstituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil · PTUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Turin · ITDonauspital · ATKU Leuven · BELandstinget i Kalmar län · SEOspedale Bellaria · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITSemmelweis University · HUThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the preferred method for the nodal staging of early breast cancer, but controversy exists regarding its universal use and consequences in small tumors. 2929 cases of breast carcinomas not larger than 15 mm and staged with SLN biopsy with or without axillary dissection were collected from the authors' institutions. The pathology of the SLNs included multilevel hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was commonly used for cases negative with HE staining. Variables influencing SLN involvement and non-SLN involvement were studied with logistic regression. Factors that influenced SLN involvement included tumor size, multifocality, grade and age. Small tumors up to 4 mm (including in situ and microinvasive carcinomas) seem to have SLN involvement in less than 10%. Non-SLN metastases were associated with tumor grade, the ratio of involved SLNs and SLN involvement type. Isolated tumor cells were not likely to be associated with further nodal load, whereas micrometastases had some subsets with low risk of non-SLN involvement and subsets with higher proportion of further nodal spread. In situ and microinvasive carcinomas have a very low risk of SLN involvement, therefore, these tumors might not need SLN biopsy for staging, and this may be the approach used for very small invasive carcinomas. If an SLN is involved, isolated tumor cells are rarely if ever associated with non-SLN metastases, and subsets of micrometastatic SLN involvement may be approached similarly. With macrometastases the risk of non-SLN involvement increases, and further axillary treatment should be generally indicated.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID17387383
OpenAlexW2073718962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.