Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17387214›Full record

ReviewThorax2007

Exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. 1: Epidemiology and pathogenesis.

Christopher H Goss, Jane L Burns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
208citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

208 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Antibiotic adjuvant therapy for pulmonary infection in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Health care costs related to home spirometry in the eICE randomized trial.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2022
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients irrespective of initial changes in FEVJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2019
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher H GossDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Campus Box 356522, 1959 NE Pacific, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. goss@u.washington.edu
Jane L Burns

Funding

Quality of Life in patients with severe Cystic FibrosisK23HL072017 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOSS, CHRISTOPHER HOOPER · 2003 to 2007
$626k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1 K23 HL72017-01NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL072017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the improving survival of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), the clinical spectrum of this complex multisystem disease continues to evolve. One of the most important clinical events for patients with CF in the course of this disease is an acute pulmonary exacerbation. Clinical and microbial epidemiology studies of CF pulmonary exacerbations continue to provide important insight into the course, prognosis and complications of the disease. This review provides a summary of the pathophysiology, clinical epidemiology and microbial epidemiology of a CF pulmonary exacerbation.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionBacteriaBronchiChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID17387214
PMCPMC2092469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.