The magic behind stem cells.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Greatness in HCT and greatness in wine.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020
   Article
2. Stem cell therapeutics--reality versus hype and hope.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2011
   Article
3. Stem cells and neuroprotection: understanding the players.International journal of molecular sciences · 2010
   Review
4. The beliefs, myths, and reality surrounding the word hema (blood) from homer to the present.Anemia · 2010
   Article
5. In vitro differentiation of embryonic and adult stem cells into hepatocytes: state of the art.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2009
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as