Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17384994›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental nephrology2007

Endothelial progenitor cells for postnatal vasculogenesis.

Masamichi Eguchi, Haruchika Masuda, Takayuki Asahara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Impaired Angiogenic Function of Fetal Endothelial Progenitor Cells viaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Kinetic analyses of vasculogenesis inform mechanistic studies.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Characterization of endothelial progenitor cells mobilization following cutaneous wounding.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masamichi EguchiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine Science, Tokai University School of Medicine, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan.
Haruchika Masuda
Takayuki Asahara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are present in the systemic circulation, are augmented in response to certain cytokines and/or tissue ischemia, and are home to--as well as incorporate into--sites of neovascularization. On the basis of these aspects, EPCs have attractive potential therapeutic applications for cardiovascular ischemic diseases as a novel cell-based strategy, mainly via a vasculogenesis mechanism. This review provides an update of the biology of EPCs, as well as highlighting the potential use of these cells for therapeutic regeneration.

Indexed as

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationStem CellsAnimalsBlood CellsCell SeparationEndothelium, VascularGenetic TherapyHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicNephrology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.