Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17384918›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2007

Evaluation of ABT-751 against childhood cancer models in vivo.

Christopher L Morton, Edward G Favours, Kimberly S Mercer, Claire R Boltz, Jeri Carol Crumpton, Chandra Tucker, Catherine A Billups, Peter J Houghton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Glioblastoma CD105Acta neuropathologica communications · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuroblastoma.Seminars in pediatric surgery · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microtubule dynamics as a target in oncology.Cancer treatment reviews · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher L MortonDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 North Lauderdale St, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Edward G Favours
Kimberly S Mercer
Claire R Boltz
Jeri Carol Crumpton
Chandra Tucker
Catherine A Billups
Peter J Houghton
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
XENOGRAFT STUDIESP01CA023099 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HOUGHTON, PETER J · 1985 to 2011
$22.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS CA23099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveABT-751 is a novel antimitotic agent that binds tubulin at the colchicine binding site. ABT-751 is undergoing Phase I trials in children, but has not been evaluated against a range of pediatric tumor models in vivo. MATERIALS AND

methodsABT-751 was evaluated against 27 subcutaneously implanted xenograft models of childhood cancer including neuroblastoma [4], osteosarcoma [4], Ewing sarcoma [2] rhabdomyosarcoma [8], medulloblastoma [1] and eight kidney cancer lines (six Wilms tumors, two rhabdoid). ABT-751 was administered at 100 mg/kg P.O. on a schedule of 5 days on, 5 days off, 5 days on, repeating the cycle at 21 days. Tumor diameters were measured at 7 day intervals for a period of 12 weeks. Three measures of antitumor activity were used: (1) clinical response criteria [e.g., partial response (PR), complete response (CR), etc.]; (2) treated to control (T/C) tumor volume at day 21; and (3) a time to event measure based on the median event free survival (EFS) of treated and control lines.

resultsABT-751 induced regression in 4 of 25 models (16%) including models of neuroblastoma that are refractory to vincristine and paclitaxel. Other regressions occurred in rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor models. ABT-751 significantly increased event free survival (EFS > 2.0) in eight models (33%) in addition to those with objective responses.

conclusionsABT-751 demonstrated intermediate activity against this tumor panel. Neuroblastoma models appear somewhat more sensitive to this agent, with objective regressions also in rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor. ABT-751 was also active in several tumor lines intrinsically refractory to vincristine or paclitaxel.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimitotic AgentsCell Line, TumorChildFemaleHumansMiceMice, SCIDNeoplasms, ExperimentalPediatricsSulfonamidesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABT751Antimitotic AgentsSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID17384918
OpenAlexW2018887623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.