ReviewInternational journal of biological sciences2007
Advances in swine transcriptomics.
Review in International journal of biological sciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pig immune response to general stimulus and to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection: a meta-analysis approach.BMC genomics · 2013Pooled it
- Review
- Re-Epithelialization Appraisal of Skin Wound in a Porcine Model Using a Salmon-Gelatin Based Biomaterial as Wound Dressing.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- Post-Genomic Methodologies and Preclinical Animal Models: Chances for the Translation of Cardioprotection to the Clinic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Zika Virus Causes Persistent Infection in Porcine Conceptuses and may Impair Health in Offspring.EBioMedicine · 2017Article
- Genome-wide profiling of Sus scrofa circular RNAs across nine organs and three developmental stages.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017Article
- Current transcriptomics in pig immunity research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015Review
- Endometrial gene expression profiling in pregnant Meishan and Yorkshire pigs on day 12 of gestation.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Structural and functional annotation of the porcine immunome.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- A gene expression atlas of the domestic pig.BMC biology · 2012Article
- Development of a porcine (Sus scofa) embryo-specific microarray: array annotation and validation.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Gene regulation of intestinal porcine epithelial cells IPEC-J2 is dependent on the site of deoxynivalenol toxicological action.PloS one · 2012Article
- Discovery approaches to UPR in athero-susceptible endothelium in vivo.Methods in enzymology · 2011Article
- Contribution of large pig for renal ischemia-reperfusion and transplantation studies: the preclinical model.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011Review
- Methods for transcriptomic analyses of the porcine host immune response: application to Salmonella infection using microarrays.Veterinary immunology and immunopathology · 2010Review
- Transcriptome analysis of porcine PBMCs after in vitro stimulation by LPS or PMA/ionomycin using an expression array targeting the pig immune response.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Identification of candidate genes for congenital splay leg in piglets by alternative analysis of DNA microarray data.International journal of biological sciences · 2009Article
- The porcine lung as a potential model for cystic fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2008Review
- Transcriptomic analysis of the dialogue between Pseudorabies virus and porcine epithelial cells during infection.BMC genomics · 2008Article
- Advances in QTL mapping in pigs.International journal of biological sciences · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The past five years have seen a tremendous rise in porcine transcriptomic data. Available porcine Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) have expanded greatly, with over 623,000 ESTs deposited in Genbank. ESTs have been used to expand the pig-human comparative maps, but such data has also been used in many ways to understand pig gene expression. Several methods have been used to identify genes differentially expressed (DE) in specific tissues or cell types under different treatments. These include open screening methods such as suppression subtractive hybridization, differential display, serial analysis of gene expression, and EST sequence frequency, as well as closed methods that measure expression of a defined set of sequences such as hybridization to membrane arrays and microarrays. The use of microarrays to begin large-scale transcriptome analysis has been recently reported, using either specialized or broad-coverage arrays. This review covers published results using the above techniques in the pig, as well as unpublished data provided by the research community, and reports on unpublished Affymetrix data from our group. Published and unpublished bioinformatics efforts are discussed, including recent work by our group to integrate two broad-coverage microarray platforms. We conclude by predicting experiments that will become possible with new anticipated tools and data, including the porcine genome sequence. We emphasize that the need for bioinformatics infrastructure to efficiently store and analyze the expanding amounts of gene expression data is critical, and that this deficit has emerged as a limiting factor for acceleration of genomic understanding in the pig.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.