ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2007
RET proto-oncogene genotyping using unlabeled probes, the masking technique, and amplicon high-resolution melting analysis.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel PIK3CA hot-spot mutation in breast cancer patients detected by HRM-COLD-PCR analysis.Breast disease · 2024Article
- Rapid Detection of Common HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations by Use of High-Resolution Melting Analysis and Unlabeled Probes.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- Article
- Nucleotide extension genotyping by high-resolution melting.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2010Article
- LightCycler technology in molecular diagnostics.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2009Article
- High resolution melting applications for clinical laboratory medicine.Experimental and molecular pathology · 2008Review
- Rapid diagnosis of MEN2B using unlabeled probe melting analysis and the LightCycler 480 instrument.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single bp mutations in the RET proto-oncogene can cause multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes. The conventional approach for genotyping RET mutations is sequencing the exons. A closed-tube RET genotyping assay using a saturating DNA dye, unlabeled probes, and amplicon high-resolution melting analysis was developed. The method required two sequential polymerase chain reaction stages, a primary and secondary assay. The primary assay analyzed RET exons 10, 11, 13, 14, and 16 with a total of seven reactions using eight unlabeled probes. The primary assay genotyped wild-type exons, a common exon 13 polymorphism, and an exon 16 mutation, whereas other RET sequence variation was detected. The primary unlabeled probe data limited the possible genotypes for the detected RET sequence variation, which permitted genotyping in a secondary assay with only two to five reactions. Six probes were designed with the masking technique and masked selected sequence variations to allow unambiguous analysis of other mutations elsewhere under the probe. After this two-stage RET genotyping assay, less than 0.2% of exons tested would require sequencing for genotype. A blinded study generated from five wild type and 29 available RET sequence variation samples was 100% concordant with sequencing. Amplicon high-resolution melting analysis with unlabeled probes and the masking technique is a fast, accurate method for genotyping the >50 RET sequence variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.