ArticlePLoS genetics2007
Incorporating single-locus tests into haplotype cladistic analysis in case-control studies.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Genetic Approaches to AD: Lessons from APOE-TOMM40 Phylogenetics.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- Estrogen-related genes and their contribution to racial differences in breast cancer risk.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2012Article
- Automated construction and testing of multi-locus gene-gene associations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- A Bayesian hierarchical model for detecting haplotype-haplotype and haplotype-environment interactions in genetic association studies.Human heredity · 2011Article
- Inferring combined CNV/SNP haplotypes from genotype data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Article
- The diverse applications of cladistic analysis of molecular evolution, with special reference to nested clade analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2010Review
- Bivariate association analyses for the mixture of continuous and binary traits with the use of extended generalized estimating equations.Genetic epidemiology · 2009Article
- Inference of haplotypic phase and missing genotypes in polyploid organisms and variable copy number genomic regions.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- hapConstructor: automatic construction and testing of haplotypes in a Monte Carlo framework.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2008Article
- Analysis of heterogeneity and epistasis in physiological mixed populations by combined structural equation modelling and latent class analysis.BMC genetics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In case-control studies, genetic associations for complex diseases may be probed either with single-locus tests or with haplotype-based tests. Although there are different views on the relative merits and preferences of the two test strategies, haplotype-based analyses are generally believed to be more powerful to detect genes with modest effects. However, a main drawback of haplotype-based association tests is the large number of distinct haplotypes, which increases the degrees of freedom for corresponding test statistics and thus reduces the statistical power. To decrease the degrees of freedom and enhance the efficiency and power of haplotype analysis, we propose an improved haplotype clustering method that is based on the haplotype cladistic analysis developed by Durrant et al. In our method, we attempt to combine the strengths of single-locus analysis and haplotype-based analysis into one single test framework. Novel in our method is that we develop a more informative haplotype similarity measurement by using p-values obtained from single-locus association tests to construct a measure of weight, which to some extent incorporates the information of disease outcomes. The weights are then used in computation of similarity measures to construct distance metrics between haplotype pairs in haplotype cladistic analysis. To assess our proposed new method, we performed simulation analyses to compare the relative performances of (1) conventional haplotype-based analysis using original haplotype, (2) single-locus allele-based analysis, (3) original haplotype cladistic analysis (CLADHC) by Durrant et al., and (4) our weighted haplotype cladistic analysis method, under different scenarios. Our weighted cladistic analysis method shows an increased statistical power and robustness, compared with the methods of haplotype cladistic analysis, single-locus test, and the traditional haplotype-based analyses. The real data analyses also show that our proposed method has practical significance in the human genetics field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.