Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17381242›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2007

Incorporating single-locus tests into haplotype cladistic analysis in case-control studies.

Jianfeng Liu, Chris Papasian, Hong-Wen Deng

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. New Genetic Approaches to AD: Lessons from APOE-TOMM40 Phylogenetics.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inferring combined CNV/SNP haplotypes from genotype data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianfeng LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
Chris Papasian
Hong-Wen Deng

Funding

ROBUST AND POWERFUL TEST OF CANDIDATE GENES TO BONE MASSR01AR050496 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2004 to 2013
$3.8M
CHARACTERIZATION OF DELETERIOUS GENOMIC MUTATIONSR01GM060402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2000 to 2005
$889k
Genetic Basis of Osteoporotic Fractures and Bone MassK01AR002170 · NIAMS · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2001 to 2005
$505k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR002170NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR 02170NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050496NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060402NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 60402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In case-control studies, genetic associations for complex diseases may be probed either with single-locus tests or with haplotype-based tests. Although there are different views on the relative merits and preferences of the two test strategies, haplotype-based analyses are generally believed to be more powerful to detect genes with modest effects. However, a main drawback of haplotype-based association tests is the large number of distinct haplotypes, which increases the degrees of freedom for corresponding test statistics and thus reduces the statistical power. To decrease the degrees of freedom and enhance the efficiency and power of haplotype analysis, we propose an improved haplotype clustering method that is based on the haplotype cladistic analysis developed by Durrant et al. In our method, we attempt to combine the strengths of single-locus analysis and haplotype-based analysis into one single test framework. Novel in our method is that we develop a more informative haplotype similarity measurement by using p-values obtained from single-locus association tests to construct a measure of weight, which to some extent incorporates the information of disease outcomes. The weights are then used in computation of similarity measures to construct distance metrics between haplotype pairs in haplotype cladistic analysis. To assess our proposed new method, we performed simulation analyses to compare the relative performances of (1) conventional haplotype-based analysis using original haplotype, (2) single-locus allele-based analysis, (3) original haplotype cladistic analysis (CLADHC) by Durrant et al., and (4) our weighted haplotype cladistic analysis method, under different scenarios. Our weighted cladistic analysis method shows an increased statistical power and robustness, compared with the methods of haplotype cladistic analysis, single-locus test, and the traditional haplotype-based analyses. The real data analyses also show that our proposed method has practical significance in the human genetics field.

Indexed as

AllelesCase-Control StudiesHaplotypesAlgorithmsArthritis, RheumatoidBayes TheoremCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationFalse Positive ReactionsGene FrequencyGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationGenome, HumanGenotypeHeterozygoteHumansGenetic MarkersMannose-Binding LectinMBL2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID17381242
PMCPMC1829402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.