ArticlePharmaceutical research2007
In vivo effects of glycyl-glutamate and glycyl-sarcosine on gabapentin oral absorption in rat.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional and Physiological Implications of Oligopeptide Transporters: Potential Targets for Pharmacological Interventions.The Journal of membrane biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo consequences of glycyl-glutamate coadministration on gabapentin oral absorption.
methodsRats were administered gabapentin (10 mg/kg plus radiotracer) by gastric gavage, in the absence and presence of dipeptides, and by intravenous administration. Serial blood samples were obtained over 6 h and the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin were determined by noncompartmental analysis.
resultsGlycyl-glutamate coadministration increased the Cmax of gabapentin by 86% as compared to gabapentin alone. In agreement, the oral absorption of gabapentin, relative to the intravenous dose, was 79% after glycyl-glutamate loading but only 47% when drug was administered alone. However, when glycyl-sarcosine was added to the orally administered admixture of gabapentin plus glycyl-glutamate, values for Cmax and AUC(0-6 h) reverted back to that of control. In contrast, the tmax and terminal half-life of gabapentin did not change after oral dosing for all treatments.
conclusionsThese findings are unique in demonstrating that under physiologic, in vivo conditions, the luminal presence of glycyl-glutamate could dramatically enhance the Cmax and AUC(0-6 h) of gabapentin. The results are consistent with previous in situ intestinal perfusion studies in rat, and establish a functional interaction between the activities of PEPT1 and amino acid exchangers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.