SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2007
Does the pulse pressure in people of European, African and South Asian descent differ? A systematic review and meta-analysis of UK data.
Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Blood Pressure Indicators and Stroke in Aged Population: A Community-Based Nested Case-Control Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and established risk factors among populations of sub-Saharan African descent in Europe: a literature review.Globalization and health · 2009Article
- Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin is associated with pulse pressure, left ventricular mass, and albuminuria in African Americans with hypertension.American journal of hypertension · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess whether the pulse pressures (PPs) in people of African and South Asian descent differ from those of the European-origin White (henceforth, White) in the UK. A systematic literature review was carried out using MEDLINE 1966-2006 and EMBASE 1980-2006. The meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane review manager software (RevMan version 4.2; Oxford, UK). Thirteen studies were examined. Results for African descent men (n=9 studies) and women (n=7) indicated that African men and women had a higher mean PP than their White counterparts. Overall weighted mean difference (WMD) in PP was 1.68 (95% confidence interval: [0.38, 2.98 mm Hg]; P=0.01) in men and 2.01 ([0.39, 3.63 mm Hg]; P<0.001) in women. South Asian men (n=7 studies) had a lower mean PP than White men (-1.94; [-3.56, -0.32 mm Hg]; P=0.02), whereas no significant difference was found between South Asian and White women (n=5 studies) (-0.40; [-3.22, 2.39 mm Hg]; P=0.77). Separate data were available for Indians (n=5 studies), Bangladeshis (n=4) and Pakistanis (n=3). Bangladeshis had a lower PP than Whites (men, -5.61; [-6.87, -4.36 mm Hg]; P<0.001) (women, -5.21; [-8.67, -1.75 mm Hg]; P=0.003). Pakistani men had a lower PP than White men (-3.33 mm Hg; [-5.67, -1.00]; P<0.001). The WMD was nonsignificantly lower in Indian men (-0.76 mm Hg), Indian women (-0.80 mm Hg) and Pakistani women (-2.06 mm Hg). The higher PP found among African descent people may contribute to their more frequent hypertension complications. However, the lower PP in South Asian populations, particularly in Bangladeshis and Pakistani men, indicates that PP is unlikely to contribute to their higher risk of cardiovascular disease in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17380151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.