Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17376239›Full record

Trial reportBMC cardiovascular disorders2007

Flow mediated dilation of the brachial artery: an investigation of methods requiring further standardization.

Alon Peretz, Daniel F Leotta, Jeffrey H Sullivan, Carol A Trenga, Fiona N Sands, Mary R Aulet, Marla Paun, Edward A Gill, Joel D Kaufman

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2011 · on this map
    Guideline
  3. AltilixNutrients · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Effects of GlucoerbJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Photoacoustics · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alon PeretzDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. alonpe@u.washington.edu <alonpe@u.washington.edu>
Daniel F Leotta
Jeffrey H Sullivan
Carol A Trenga
Fiona N Sands
Mary R Aulet
Marla Paun
Edward A Gill
Joel D Kaufman
University of Washington · USRoosevelt University · USUniversity of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory · US

Funding

ZIPRASIDONE IN NORMAL HEPATIC FUNCTION SUBJECTS &IN HEPATIC DYSFUCTIN SUBJECTSM01RR000037 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCDONALD, RUTH C · 1985 to 2007
$33.8M
Environmental Factors in Cardiovascular DiseaseK24ES013195 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAUFMAN, JOEL DANIEL · 2005 to 2014
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000037NCRR NIH HHS M01RR-00037NIEHS NIH HHS ES013195NIEHS NIH HHS K24 ES013195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to establish a consistent method for brachial artery reactivity assessment, we analyzed commonly used approaches to the test and their effects on the magnitude and time-course of flow mediated dilation (FMD), and on test variability and repeatability. As a popular and noninvasive assessment of endothelial function, several different approaches have been employed to measure brachial artery reactivity with B-mode ultrasound. Despite some efforts, there remains a lack of defined normal values and large variability in measurement technique.

methodsTwenty-six healthy volunteers underwent repeated brachial artery diameter measurements by B-mode ultrasound. Following baseline diameter recordings we assessed endothelium-dependent flow mediated dilation by inflating a blood pressure cuff either on the upper arm (proximal) or on the forearm (distal).

resultsThirty-seven measures were performed using proximal occlusion and 25 with distal occlusion. Following proximal occlusion relative to distal occlusion, FMD was larger (16.2 +/- 1.2% vs. 7.3 +/- 0.9%, p < 0.0001) and elongated (107.2 s vs. 67.8 s, p = 0.0001). Measurement of the test repeatability showed that differences between the repeated measures were greater on average when the measurements were done using the proximal method as compared to the distal method (2.4%; 95% CI 0.5-4.3; p = 0.013).

conclusionThese findings suggest that forearm compression holds statistical advantages over upper arm compression. Added to documented physiological and practical reasons, we propose that future studies should use forearm compression in the assessment of endothelial function.

Indexed as

AdultArmBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationBrachial ArteryEndothelium, VascularFemaleForearmHumansMaleRegional Blood FlowReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsUltrasonographyVasodilation

Identifiers

PMID17376239
PMCPMC1847451
OpenAlexW2078356687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.