Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17374741›Full record

ArticleBlood2007

Impact of cytogenetics on outcome of matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission.

Martin S Tallman, Gordon W Dewald, Sharavi Gandham, Brent R Logan, Armand Keating, Hillard M Lazarus, Mark R Litzow, Jayesh Mehta, Tanya Pedersen, Waleska S Pérez and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Monosomal Karyotype Myeloid Malignancies.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network: progress since the State of the Science Symposium 2007.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adolescent and young adults compared with children and older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Martin S TallmanNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. m-tallman@northwestern.edu
Gordon W Dewald
Sharavi Gandham
Brent R Logan
Armand Keating
Hillard M Lazarus
Mark R Litzow
Jayesh Mehta
Tanya Pedersen
Waleska S Pérez
Jacob M Rowe
Meir Wetzler
Daniel J Weisdorf

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NCI NIH HHS U24-CA76518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the treatment-related mortality, relapse rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) by cytogenetic risk group of 261 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission (CR1) and 299 patients in CR2 in undergoing matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For patients in first CR, the DFS and OS at 5 years were similar for the favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk groups at 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-56%) and 30% (22%-38%); 27% (19%-39%) and 29% (8%-56%); and 30% (95% CI, 22%-38%) and 30% (95% CI, 20%-41%), respectively. For patients in second CR, the DFS and OS at 5 years were 42% (95% CI, 33%-52%) and 35% (95% CI, 28%-43%); 38% (95% CI, 23%-54%) and 45% (95% CI, 35%-55%); and 37% (95% CI, 30%-45%) and 36% (95% CI, 21%-53%), respectively. Cytogenetics had little influence on the overall outcome for patients in first CR. In second CR, outcome was modestly, but not significantly, better for patients with favorable cytogenetics. The graft-versus-leukemia effect appeared effective, even in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics. However, treatment-related mortality was high. Matched unrelated donor HSCT should be considered for all patients with unfavorable cytogenetics who lack a suitable HLA-matched sibling donor.

Indexed as

CytogeneticsAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultBone Marrow TransplantationChildChild, PreschoolChromosome AberrationsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHistocompatibilityHumansLeukemia, MyeloidMiddle AgedRemission InductionSurvival AnalysisTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID17374741
PMCPMC1896123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.