Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17373854›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2007

Superfamily assignments for the yeast proteome through integration of structure prediction with the gene ontology.

Lars Malmström, Michael Riffle, Charlie E M Strauss, Dylan Chivian, Trisha N Davis, Richard Bonneau, David Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Toward the solution of the protein structure prediction problem.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lars MalmströmDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Michael Riffle
Charlie E M Strauss
Dylan Chivian
Trisha N Davis
Richard Bonneau
David Baker

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR11823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one of the best-studied model organisms, yet the three-dimensional structure and molecular function of many yeast proteins remain unknown. Yeast proteins were parsed into 14,934 domains, and those lacking sequence similarity to proteins of known structure were folded using the Rosetta de novo structure prediction method on the World Community Grid. This structural data was integrated with process, component, and function annotations from the Saccharomyces Genome Database to assign yeast protein domains to SCOP superfamilies using a simple Bayesian approach. We have predicted the structure of 3,338 putative domains and assigned SCOP superfamily annotations to 581 of them. We have also assigned structural annotations to 7,094 predicted domains based on fold recognition and homology modeling methods. The domain predictions and structural information are available in an online database at http://rd.plos.org/10.1371_journal.pbio.0050076_01.

Indexed as

Genes, FungalProteomeBayes TheoremProtein ConformationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17373854
PMCPMC1828141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.