ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2007
Dentofacial parameters explaining variability in retroclination of the maxillary central incisors.
Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of anterior teeth crown-root morphology and alveolar bone structure in patients with closed deep overbite using cone beam computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Changes in Orbicularis Oris Superior and Masseter Muscle Activities After Upper Incisor Protrusion in Class II Division 2 Malocclusion: An Electromyographic Study.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2022Article
- Changes in lips, cheeks and tongue pressures after upper incisor protrusion in Class II division 2 malocclusion: a prospective study.Progress in orthodontics · 2017Article
- Combined use of miniscrews and continuous arch for intrusive root movement of incisors in Class II division 2 with gummy smile.The Angle orthodontist · 2014Article
- [Craniofacial morphology of child and adult deepbite: a cross-sectional study].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2014Article
- Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe interrelation between retroclination of the maxillary central incisors and dentofacial parameters is a controversial subject in the literature. In contrast to comparisons between malocclusion and control groups, the objective of the present study was to identify skeletal, dentoalveolar or perioral (soft-tissue) factors which primarily determine how severely retroclination is individually manifested. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor this purpose we evaluated the pretherapeutic lateral cephalograms of 83 patients with an inclination of the maxillary central incisors ranging from physiological values to very severe retroclination (inclination to anterior cranial base between 104 degrees and 64 degrees ). A detailed analysis of the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft-tissue morphology was performed using lateral cephalograms taken prior to therapy. The statistical analysis included the calculation of multiple regression models for maxillary central incisor inclination and different parameters describing the lip-to-incisor relationship as dependent variables.
resultsA regression model including 1) the lip-line level measured at the dorsal upper-lower lip contact point, 2) the sagittal intermaxillary relationship, and 3) the inclination of the mandibular central incisors explained 81% of the variability in maxillary central incisor inclination (p < 0.0001 for all three parameters). Statistical analysis of the morphologic base of a high dorsal lip-line level (i.e., the predominant characteristic in the retroclination cases) revealed the significance of soft-tissue, dentoalveolar, and skeletal variables (p < 0.001).
conclusionsComplementary to results of previous resting lippressure measurements, this cephalometric study suggests that a high lip-line level is the predominant causative factor for a cover- bite or Class II, Division 2 malocclusion. Therefore, we conclude that (1) lip-line measurements should be included in routine cephalometric diagnostics, and (2) that a high lip-line must be eliminated by therapeutic measures in these malocclusions to prevent a post-orthodontic relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17372709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.