Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17372709›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2007

Dentofacial parameters explaining variability in retroclination of the maxillary central incisors.

Bernd G Lapatki, Andreas Klatt, Jürgen Schulte-Mönting, Irmtrud E Jonas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Craniofacial morphology of child and adult deepbite: a cross-sectional study].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2014
    Article
  6. Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernd G LapatkiDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Freiburg i.Br., Freiburg, Germany. bernd.lapatki@uniklinik-freiburg.dex
Andreas Klatt
Jürgen Schulte-Mönting
Irmtrud E Jonas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe interrelation between retroclination of the maxillary central incisors and dentofacial parameters is a controversial subject in the literature. In contrast to comparisons between malocclusion and control groups, the objective of the present study was to identify skeletal, dentoalveolar or perioral (soft-tissue) factors which primarily determine how severely retroclination is individually manifested. MATERIALS AND

methodsFor this purpose we evaluated the pretherapeutic lateral cephalograms of 83 patients with an inclination of the maxillary central incisors ranging from physiological values to very severe retroclination (inclination to anterior cranial base between 104 degrees and 64 degrees ). A detailed analysis of the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft-tissue morphology was performed using lateral cephalograms taken prior to therapy. The statistical analysis included the calculation of multiple regression models for maxillary central incisor inclination and different parameters describing the lip-to-incisor relationship as dependent variables.

resultsA regression model including 1) the lip-line level measured at the dorsal upper-lower lip contact point, 2) the sagittal intermaxillary relationship, and 3) the inclination of the mandibular central incisors explained 81% of the variability in maxillary central incisor inclination (p < 0.0001 for all three parameters). Statistical analysis of the morphologic base of a high dorsal lip-line level (i.e., the predominant characteristic in the retroclination cases) revealed the significance of soft-tissue, dentoalveolar, and skeletal variables (p < 0.001).

conclusionsComplementary to results of previous resting lippressure measurements, this cephalometric study suggests that a high lip-line level is the predominant causative factor for a cover- bite or Class II, Division 2 malocclusion. Therefore, we conclude that (1) lip-line measurements should be included in routine cephalometric diagnostics, and (2) that a high lip-line must be eliminated by therapeutic measures in these malocclusions to prevent a post-orthodontic relapse.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnthropometryCephalometryChildFemaleHumansIncisorMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IIReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.