Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17371908›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2007

Neuropsychological deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analytic review.

A D Hutchinson, J L Mathias

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Executive functions in primary progressive aphasia: A meta-analysis.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Meta-analytic Review of Memory Impairment in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Screening for Executive Impairment in Patients with Frontotemporal Dementia: Evidence from the Greek Version of the Frontier Executive Screen.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gaps in clinical research in frontotemporal dementia: A call for diversity and disparities-focused research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Cognitive and behavioural inhibition deficits in neurodegenerative dementias.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A D HutchinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
J L Mathias
University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to identify the cognitive tests that best discriminate between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). A comprehensive search of all studies examining the cognitive performance of persons diagnosed with AD and FTD, published between 1980 and 2006, was conducted. Ninety-four studies were identified, comprising 2936 AD participants and 1748 FTD participants. Weighted Cohen's d effect sizes, percentage overlap statistics, confidence intervals and fail-safe Ns were calculated for each cognitive test that was used by two or more studies. The most discriminating cognitive tests were measures of orientation, memory, language, visuomotor function and general cognitive ability. Although there were large and significant differences between groups on these measures, there was substantial overlap in the scores of the AD and FTD groups. Age, education, years since diagnosis and diagnostic criteria did not significantly contribute to the group differences. Given the large overlap in the test performance of persons diagnosed with AD and FTD, cognitive tests should be used cautiously and in conjunction with a medical history, behavioural observations, imaging and information from relatives when making differential diagnoses.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAlzheimer DiseaseDementiaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumans

Identifiers

PMID17371908
PMCPMC2117891
OpenAlexW2157735468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.