Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17371590›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2007

Evidence for placebo effects on physical but not on biochemical outcome parameters: a review of clinical trials.

Karin Meissner, Hans Distel, Ulla Mitzdorf

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Acupuncture and assisted reproductive technology.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Placebo, nocebo: Believing in the field of medicine.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimizing ExpectationsFrontiers in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015
    Review
  18. The placebo effect in allergen-specific immunotherapy trials.Clinical and translational allergy · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The placebo effect: advances from different methodological approaches.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karin MeissnerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. karin.meissner@med.uni-muenchen.de
Hans Distel
Ulla Mitzdorf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent reviews on placebo effects in clinical trials suggest that objective changes following placebo treatments may not exist or, at least, have been considerably overestimated. However, the possibility that yet unidentified subsets of parameters are responsive to placebo treatments has not been taken into account. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the effects of placebo treatments on objectively measured outcome parameters by specifically focusing on peripheral disease processes.

methodsAn initial dataset was collected from a MEDLINE search for placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials. Trials with stable disease conditions were identified, and the effects of placebo treatments on peripheral outcome parameters were estimated by the changes from baseline in the placebo groups. An explorative data analysis was conducted in order to identify parameter classes with differential responsiveness to placebo treatments. A subgroup meta-analysis of a second dataset was performed to test whether the preliminary classification would also apply to placebo effects derived from the comparison of placebo groups with untreated control groups.

resultsThe explorative analysis of outcome parameters and strength of placebo effects yielded a classification into responsive "physical" versus non-responsive "biochemical" parameters. In total, 50% of trials measuring physical parameters showed significant placebo effects, compared with 6% of trials measuring biochemical parameters. A subgroup meta-analysis substantiated the differential response (physical parameters: n = 14, Hedges' pooled effect size g = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.46; biochemical parameters: n = 15, g = 0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.10). The subanalysis of the second dataset supported the classification and revealed a significant improvement for physical parameters (n = 20, g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36) and a deterioration for biochemical parameters (n = 6, g = -0.17, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.02).

conclusionThe results suggest that placebo interventions can improve physical disease processes of peripheral organs more easily and effectively than biochemical processes. This differential response offers a good starting point for theoretical considerations on possible mediating mechanisms, and for future investigations in this field.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID17371590
PMCPMC1847831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.