ArticleProtoplasma2007
Effect of leaf position on levels of the chloroplast and cytosolic fructose bisphosphatase isozymes in the pea leaf nucleus.
Article in Protoplasma, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunocytolocalization experiments indicate that nuclear levels of the pea leaf cytosolic fructose bisphosphatase are higher in leaves located near the base of the plant and lower in expanded leaves at the apex. It seems possible that the cytosolic isozyme in the nucleus has a role in tissue aging. In contrast, there is no indication that leaf position or tissue age affects levels of the chloroplastic enzyme in the nucleus. The density of the chloroplast fructose bisphosphatase is higher in the nucleolus than in the nucleoplasm. Conversely, the density of the cytosolic isozyme is slightly higher in the nucleoplasm. Analysis of double immunolabeling experiments indicates that both isozymes are distributed nonrandomly with respect to DNA, and therefore colocalized with DNA, in the nucleus, and that the chloroplast isozyme is also distributed nonrandomly with respect to DNA in the chloroplast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.