Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17367120›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2007

Quantitative conformationally sampled pharmacophore for delta opioid ligands: reevaluation of hydrophobic moieties essential for biological activity.

Denzil Bernard, Andrew Coop, Alexander D MacKerell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Force Fields for Small Molecules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular details of the activation of the μ opioid receptor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intrinsic energy landscapes of amino acid side-chains.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Denzil BernardDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
Andrew Coop
Alexander D MacKerell

Funding

University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and InnovationU01FD005946 · FDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BENTLEY, WILLIAM E., POLLI, JAMES E · 2016 to 2025
$21.5M
OPIOIDS WITH DELTA ANTAGONIST AND MU AGONIST ACTIVITYR01DA013583 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COOP, ANDREW · 2001 to 2012
$2.5M
Substrate requirements of the bile acid transporterR01DK067530 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI POLLI, JAMES E · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
Reversing the toxic effects of drugs of abuseK02DA019634 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COOP, ANDREW · 2005 to 2009
$528k
FDA HHS U01 FD005946NIDA NIH HHS DA13583NIDA NIH HHS DA19634NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA019634NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013583NIDDK NIH HHS DK67530NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated several therapeutic applications for delta opioid agonists and antagonists. To exploit the therapeutic potential of delta opioids developing a structural basis for the activity of ligands at the delta opioid receptor is essential. The conformationally sampled pharmacophore (CSP) method (Bernard et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3103-3107) is extended here to obtain quantitative models of delta opioid ligand efficacy and affinity. Quantification is performed via overlap integrals of the conformational space sampled by ligands with respect to a reference compound. Iterative refinement of the CSP model identified hydrophobic groups other than the traditional phenylalanine residues as important for efficacy and affinity in DSLET and ICI 174 864. The obtained models for a structurally diverse set of peptidic and nonpeptidic delta opioid ligands offer good predictions with R2 values>0.9, and the predicted efficacy for a set of test compounds was consistent with the experimental values.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorEnkephalin, LeucineHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationPhenylalanineQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipRatsReceptors, Opioid, deltaEnkephalin, Leucineenkephalin, Ser(2), Leu(5), Thr(6)-LigandsN,N-diallyl-tyrosyl-alpha-aminoisobutyric acid-phenylalanyl-leucinePhenylalanineReceptors, Opioid, delta

Identifiers

PMID17367120
PMCPMC2631547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.