Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17364197›Full record

ReviewMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2007

Public and private mechanisms of life extension in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Koen Houthoofd, Jacques R Vanfleteren

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nonhuman primate calorie restriction.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Developmental biomarkers of aging in Caenorhabditis elegans.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2010
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Replicative aging in yeast: the means to the end.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2008
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koen HouthoofdDepartment of Biology, Ghent University, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Jacques R Vanfleteren
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model organisms have been widely used to study the ageing phenomenon in order to learn about human ageing. Although the phylogenetic diversity between vertebrates and some of the most commonly used model systems could hardly be greater, several mechanisms of life extension are public (common characteristic in divergent species) and likely share a common ancestry. Dietary restriction, reduced IGF-signaling and, seemingly, reduced ROS-induced damage are the best known mechanisms for extending longevity in a variety of organisms. In this review, we summarize the knowledge of ageing in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and compare the mechanisms of life extension with knowledge from other model organisms.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBiological EvolutionCaenorhabditis elegansLongevityModels, Animal

Identifiers

PMID17364197
OpenAlexW1965579596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.