Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1736290›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1992

Distribution of interspersed repeats (Alu and Kpn) on NotI restriction fragments of human chromosome 21.

J Sainz, L Pevny, Y Wu, C R Cantor, C L Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SINE and LINE within human centromeres.Journal of molecular evolution · 1996
    Article
  2. Pig genome analysis: differential distribution of SINE and LINE sequences is less pronounced than in the human and mouse genomes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1996
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J SainzDivision of Chemical Biodynamics, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
L Pevny
Y Wu
C R Cantor
C L Smith

Funding

GENE STRUCTURE, ARRANGEMENT, DYNAMICS, AND EXPRESSIONR35CA039782 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CANTOR, CHARLES R · 1985 to 1991
–
NCI NIH HHS CA39782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interspersed repeated sequences (Alu and Kpn) were used as probes to detect a set of Not I restriction fragments of human chromosome 21 from the hybrid cell line WAV17. Forty different Not I fragments, ranging in size from less than 0.05 megabase (Mb) to 7.0 Mb, were identified. The total length of these fragments was 47.3 Mb. This length provides an estimate of the minimum size of the chromosome and a minimum number of fragments to be ordered to create a complete restriction map. The average length Not I fragment is 1.2 Mb. Alu and Kpn fragments are not always coincident: a 2.9-Mb fragment is detected with Kpn but not with Alu, and 13 fragments, ranging from less than 0.05 Mb to 5.6 Mb, are detected with Alu but not with Kpn; the 26 remaining fragments, covering 75% (35.3 Mb) of the total length, are detected with both repetitive probes. The presence of so many noncoincident fragments and the high variation of the hybridization signal intensities of the fragments suggest a very nonuniform distribution of Kpn and Alu repeats.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRestriction MappingBlotting, SouthernChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA ProbesHumansDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA ProbesGCGGCCGC-specific type II deoxyribonucleases

Identifiers

PMID1736290
PMCPMC48389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.