Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17362682›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2007

Management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Tudor G Jovin, Rishi Gupta, Michael B Horowitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tudor G JovinUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Stroke Institute, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite C-400, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. jovintg@upmc.edu
Rishi Gupta
Michael B Horowitz
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently completed prospective studies have shown that with an incidence of recurrent stroke of approximately 10% per year, significant mortality, and other vascular comorbidities, symptomatic intracranial stenosis is a marker of aggressive vascular disease. Although strict control of atherosclerotic risk factors and antithrombotic therapy preferably with antiplatelet agents should be the mainstay of treatment for every patient with this disease, some patients are likely to remain refractory to medical therapy. These high-risk patients appear to be individuals with recent symptoms and severe (> 70%) stenosis with clinical and imaging evidence of hemodynamic impairment distal to the stenotic artery. Advances in balloon and stent technology have made consideration of these high-risk patients for endovascular management with angioplasty and stenting possible, which should ideally take place as part of randomized clinical trials, because the benefit of these high-risk therapies compared with medical therapy is not yet established. This article reviews available medical treatment options for symptomatic intracranial disease and outlines the current state of endovascular therapy for this disease.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCarotid Artery, CommonCarotid StenosisClinical Trials as TopicHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryIntracranial ArteriosclerosisStentsStrokeVertebrobasilar Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID17362682
OpenAlexW1978110144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.