ReviewDrugs & aging2007
Advances in prostate cancer immunotherapies.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic analysis on the clinical safety and efficacy of onco-virotherapy.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021Article
- TGF-BETA IN THE NATURAL HISTORY OF PROSTATE CANCER.Acta clinica Croatica · 2019Review
- Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy: Exploiting the HLA Class II Pathway in Vaccine Design.Journal of clinical & cellular immunology · 2015Article
- HLA Class II Antigen Presentation in Prostate Cancer Cells: A Novel Approach to Prostate Tumor Immunotherapy.The Open cancer immunology journal · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a major cause of mortality in men in the Western world. Although treatment of early stage prostate cancer with radiation therapy or prostatectomy is efficient in most cases, some patients develop a fatal hormone-refractory disease. Treatments in this case are limited to aggressive chemotherapies, which can reduce serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in some patients. Taxane- and platinum-compound-based chemotherapies produce a survival benefit of only a few months. Therefore, it is crucial to develop novel, well tolerated treatment strategies. Over the past years, immunotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer has been studied in numerous clinical trials. The fact that the prostate is a non-essential organ makes prostate cancer an excellent target for immunotherapy. Administration of antibodies targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 or the prostate-specific membrane antigen led to stabilisation of PSA levels in several patients. Vaccination of prostate cancer patients with irradiated allogeneic prostate cell lines has demonstrated that whole cell-based vaccines can significantly attenuate increases in PSA. Two different recombinant viral expression vectors have been applied in prostate cancer treatment: poxvirus and adenovirus vectors. Both vaccines have the advantages of using a natural method to induce immune responses and achieving high levels of transgene expression. Vaccinia viruses in combination with recombinant fowlpox or canarypox virus have been used to express recombinant PSA. Several studies demonstrated that this approach is safe and can lead to stabilisation of PSA values. A very promising approach in prostate cancer immunotherapy is vaccination of patients with dendritic cells. Thereby, peptides, recombinant proteins, tumour lysates or messenger RNA have been used to deliver antigens to autologous dendritic cells. Loading of dendritic cells with up to five different peptides derived from multiple proteins expressed in prostate cancer demonstrated that cytotoxic T-cell responses could be elicited in prostate cancer patients. Sipuleucel-T (APC8015), an immunotherapy product consisting of antigen-presenting cells, loaded ex vivo with a recombinant fusion protein consisting of prostatic acid phosphatase linked to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, demonstrated in a phase III, placebo-controlled trial an improvement in median time to disease progression. The improvement in overall survival was 4.5 months for sipuleucel-T-treated patients compared with the placebo group. Although there is a minor increase in overall survival of metastatic prostate cancer patients with some approaches, more effective therapeutic strategies need to be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.