Trial reportDer Unfallchirurg2007
[Prognostic value of routine parameters and laboratory parameters after major trauma. A prospective preclinical-clinical study of air rescue patients].
Trial report in Der Unfallchirurg, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In search of benchmarking for mortality following multiple trauma: a Swiss trauma center experience.World journal of surgery · 2009Article
- Alcohol-positive multiple trauma patients with and without blood transfusion: an outcome analysis.Journal of trauma management & outcomes · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this prospective study, 273 air rescue patients with major blunt trauma were followed throughout their prehospital and clinical management. A blood sample was taken upon arrival and data acquired at three defined time points. With these data, for the first time a prognosis prediction model with prehospital and early clinical routine parameters and routine lab parameters was tested for predictive power. Coagulation test, value of base excess, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) value, severity of injury, and age appeared to be relevant parameters. The probability of survival after major blunt trauma decreases with increasing age and severity of injury and decreasing values in GCS, base excess, and coagulation test. These data showed that it is possible with the help of easily accessible routine parameters and routine lab parameters to predict individual survival with a high degree of accuracy of 82%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17361450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.