Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17360853›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2007

Use of serological assays for diagnosis of hepatitis E virus genotype 1 and 3 infections in a setting of low endemicity.

M Herremans, J Bakker, E Duizer, H Vennema, M P G Koopmans

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Laboratory Diagnosis of HEV Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Genetic Evolution of Hepatitis E Virus.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Aptamer-based approaches for the detection of waterborne pathogens.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Hepatitis E Virus.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hepatitis e virus: current concepts and future perspectives.Current infectious disease reports · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Hepatitis E virus infection.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Transmission, diagnosis, and management of hepatitis E: an update.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnosis of hepatitis E.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M HerremansNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, Diagnostic Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Tineke.Herremans@rivm.nl
J Bakker
E Duizer
H Vennema
M P G Koopmans
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the occurrence of genotype 3 hepatitis E virus (HEV) in regions of low endemicity, it is important to validate the currently used serological assays for diagnosing infections with viruses belonging to this lineage, since these assays only use antigens derived from genotype 1 and 2 viruses. We evaluated the Genelabs enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the RecomBlot from Mikrogen for the detection of HEV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG under conditions of low endemicity. We compared test results of 16 patients with locally acquired genotype 3 HEV, 8 genotype 1 patients, 167 healthy controls from the general population, and 101 cases with hepatitis due to other viral causes. The measured specificities of the ELISA (98%) and the RecomBlot (97%) were comparable to those given by the manufacturer for IgM but were significantly lower for IgG (93% by ELISA and 66% by immunoblotting, versus reported values of 98% for ELISA and 95% for blotting). Antibody levels detected following infections with genotype 3 were lower than those following genotype 1 infections except for those measured in the IgM ELISA. Reactivity to the four antigens used in the immunoblot assay were analyzed and showed differences in the IgM immunoblot reactions between genotype 1 patients and genotype 3 patients. The ORF3 antigen was the most specific antigen. The specificity could be improved by a combined testing regimen with confirmation by immunoblotting of all positive ELISA results and by raising the cutoff of the IgG immunoblot assay without loss of sensitivity. We conclude that a combination of ELISA and immunoblotting is needed for acceptable specificity and sensitivity of HEV assays under conditions of low endemicity.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGenotypeHepatitis AntibodiesHepatitis EHepatitis E virusHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMaleNetherlandsRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityHepatitis AntibodiesImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17360853
PMCPMC1865643
OpenAlexW2139418795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.