Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17360840›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Comparison of three methods for rapid identification of mycobacterial clinical isolates to the species level.

Xueqiong Wu, Junxian Zhang, Jianqin Liang, Yang Lu, Hongmin Li, Chuihuan Li, Jun Yue, Lishui Zhang, Zhihui Liu

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xueqiong WuTuberculosis Research Laboratory, Tuberculosis Center, The 309th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100091, China. wu-xueqiong@263.net
Junxian Zhang
Jianqin Liang
Yang Lu
Hongmin Li
Chuihuan Li
Jun Yue
Lishui Zhang
Zhihui Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new PCR-reverse dot blot hybridization (RDBH) assay was developed for the rapid identification of Mycobacterium species in clinical isolates. The assay, which targets the 16S rRNA, was evaluated for 27 mycobacterial reference strains and 340 clinical isolates that were simultaneously identified by DNA sequencing and conventional methods, including growth characteristics, pigment production, colony morphology, and biochemical tests. All reference strains and clinical isolates hybridized to the Mycobacterium genus probe (probe M) on the membrane (100% sensitivity). Each probe had only one hybridization signal with the corresponding Mycobacterium species or complex (100% specificity). Compared with DNA sequencing, the RDBH assay correctly identified 337 (99.1% accuracy) of the 340 isolates tested. One M. asia isolate and one M. neoaurum isolate were not identified by the RDBH assay due to the absence of specific probes for the two species on the membrane. Three isolates with different nucleotide sequences from M. intracellulare reference strains had a negative hybridization signal with probe c, which is specific for M. intracellulare. The whole procedure can be completed within 2.5 h post-PCR processing. A total of 32 of 340 isolates were erroneously identified by conventional methods (90.6% accuracy). Molecular identification based on the 16S rRNA sequence was superior to the conventional approaches in speed, sensitivity, and specificity. Therefore, the RDBH assay can be considered a rapid, simple, and reliable method for routine identification of frequently occurring and clinically relevant mycobacteria.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBase SequenceDNA, BacterialHumansImmunoblottingMolecular Sequence DataMycobacteriumMycobacterium InfectionsNucleic Acid HybridizationPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityTime FactorsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID17360840
PMCPMC1933065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.