Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17360731›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2007

Use of a primary care database to determine trends in genital chlamydia testing, diagnostic episodes and management in UK general practice, 1990-2004.

Gwenda Hughes, Tim Williams, Ian Simms, Catherine Mercer, Kevin Fenton, Jackie Cassell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Management of first-episode pelvic inflammatory disease in primary care: results from a large UK primary care database.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Focus on Chlamydia.Sexually transmitted infections · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gwenda HughesDepartment of HIV and STIs, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, UK. gwenda.hughes@hpa.org.uk
Tim Williams
Ian Simms
Catherine Mercer
Kevin Fenton
Jackie Cassell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the extent of testing, diagnostic episodes and management of genital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection in UK primary care using a large primary care database.

methodsThe incidence of CT tests, diagnostic episodes, treatments and referrals was measured for all adult patients in the General Practice Research Database between 1990 and 2004.

resultsRates of CT testing in those aged 12-64 years in 2004 increased to 1439/100,000 patient years (py) in women but only 74/100,000 py in men. Testing rates were highest among 20-24-year-old women (5.5% tested in 2004), followed by 25-34-year-old women (3.7% tested in 2004). 0.5% of registered 16-24-year-old women were diagnosed as having CT infection in 2004. Three-quarters of patients with a recorded diagnosis of CT had had an appropriate prescription issued in 2004, a proportion that increased from 1990 along with a decrease in referrals to genitourinary medicine. In 2004, general practitioners treated 25.0% of all recorded diagnoses of CT in women and 5.1% of those in men.

conclusionsTesting for and diagnostic episodes of CT in primary care have increased since 1990. Testing continues disproportionately to target women aged >24 years. Extremely low rates of testing in men, together with high positivity, demonstrate a missed opportunity for diagnosis of CT and contact tracing in general practice.

Indexed as

Chlamydia trachomatisAdolescentAdultChildChlamydia InfectionsFamily PracticeFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningReferral and ConsultationUnited KingdomVenereology

Identifiers

PMID17360731
PMCPMC2598670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.