Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17360383›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Neural correlates of perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma in humans.

R S Weil, J M Kilner, J D Haynes, G Rees

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Contextual novelty modulates the neural dynamics of reward anticipation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  13. A new taxonomy for perceptual filling-in.Brain research reviews · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

R S WeilWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom. r.weil@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
J M Kilner
J D Haynes
G Rees
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0500743Wellcome Trust 067453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a uniformly illuminated surface is placed eccentrically on a dynamic textured background, after a few seconds, it is perceived to disappear and be replaced by the background texture. Such texture filling-in is thought to occur in retinotopic visual cortex, but it has proven difficult to distinguish the contributions of invisible target and visible background to signals measured in these areas. Here, we used magnetoencephalography to measure time-dependent brain responses in human observers experiencing texture completion. We measured responses specifically associated with the filled-in target, by isolating neural population signals entrained at the frequency of flicker of the target. When perceptual completion occurred, and the target became invisible, there was significant reduction in the magnetoencephalography power at the target frequency over contralateral posterior sensors. However, even a subjectively invisible target nevertheless evoked frequency-specific signals compared with a no-target baseline. These data represent evidence for a persistent target-specific representation even for stimuli rendered invisible because of perceptual filling-in.

Indexed as

AdultBehaviorEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleOcular Physiological PhenomenaOptic NerveScotomaVisual FieldsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID17360383
PMCPMC1829288
OpenAlexW2099223635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.