Trial reportRheumatology international2007
Persistent clinical response of infliximab treatment, over a 4-year period in ankylosing spondylitis.
Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Long-term MRI findings in Ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with TNF inhibitors for a decade".Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Impact of Infliximab Biosimilar CT-P13 Dose and Infusion Interval on Real-World Drug Survival and Effectiveness in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Predictors of response and drug survival in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with infliximab.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2015Article
- Long-term safety and efficacy of infliximab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2015Review
- Long-term use of adalimumab in the treatment of rheumatic diseases.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2009Review
- Management of ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2009Review
- [Biologics in the early treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and related forms of spondyloarthritis].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our aim was to investigate the efficacy, toxicity, and drug discontinuation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with infliximab. Thirty-five patients with AS, who were enrolled between June 2001 and December 2002 were treated with infliximab. All patients fulfilled the New York revised criteria for AS and had axial disease. Infliximab (5 mg/kg weight), was given intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter. If this failed to give an acceptable treatment response, the interval was shortened to 6 or 4 weeks. The patients were followed-up at predefined times according to a standardized protocol. Data concerning infliximab efficacy, tolerability, adverse events, interval, and drug discontinuation were all recorded. Clinical improvement according to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50% and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study group (ASAS) 40%, and ASAS 5/6 response criteria were recorded. Infliximab treatment resulted in a rapid improvement in the BASDAI and ASAS scores in the first year of the treatment, which sustained throughout the fourth year. More specifically, after the third year of treatment 17/35 (48.6%) of patients achieved BASDAI 50% response criteria, 19/35 (54.3%) attained the ASAS 40% and 15/35 (42.9%) reached the ASAS 5/6. After the fourth year of treatment BASDAI 50% was reached by 17/35 (48.6%) of patients, ASAS 40% by 17/35 (48.6%), while ASAS 5/6 was attained by 15/35 (42.9%). The clinical improvement was associated with the reduction of acute phase reactants as measured by C-reactive protein levels. After the first year of treatment, the "survival rate" of infliximab was 94.3%, after the second year was 91.4%, after the third year was 85.7% and even after 4 years of treatment still maintained high 77.9%. Six (17.1%) patients were withdrawn during the observational period. Three because of lack of efficacy, two because of allergic reactions and one lost from follow-up. Infliximab was effective, safe, and well tolerated in patients with AS. The clinical response was maintained for a period of 4 years and over, with infliximab survival of 77.9%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.