Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17356993›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2007

Patient satisfaction with primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone treatment.

Declan T Barry, Brent A Moore, Michael V Pantalon, Marek C Chawarski, Lynn E Sullivan, Patrick G O'Connor, Richard S Schottenfeld, David A Fiellin

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Involvement of people who use alcohol and other drug services in the development of patient-reported measures of experience: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Declan T BarryDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519-1187, USA, declan.barry@yale.edu
Brent A Moore
Michael V Pantalon
Marek C Chawarski
Lynn E Sullivan
Patrick G O'Connor
Richard S Schottenfeld
David A Fiellin

Funding

SUBSTANCE ABUSEK12DA000167 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHANIE S O'MALLEY, Marc N Potenza · 1991 to 2026
$17.7M
COUNSELING CONDITONS FOR THRICE WEEKLY BUPRENORPHINER01DA009803 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOTTENFELD, RICHARD S · 1995 to 2003
$1.9M
IMPROVING EFFICACY OF DRUG ABUSE TREATMENTK24DA000445 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOTTENFELD, RICHARD S · 2000 to 2009
$1.3M
Increasing Treatment Adherence in Co-Occurring DisordersK23DA015144 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PANTALON, MICHAEL V · 2002 to 2006
$711k
NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA000167NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA00167NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA015144NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA15144NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA000445NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA000445-03NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009803NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009803-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFactors associated with satisfaction among patients receiving primary care-based buprenorphine/naloxone are unknown.

objectiveTo identify factors related to patient satisfaction in patients receiving primary care-based buprenorphine/naloxone that varied in counseling intensity (20 vs 45 minutes) and office visit frequency (weekly vs thrice weekly). DESIGN AND

participantsOne hundred and forty-two opioid-dependent subjects. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, drug treatment history, and substance use status at baseline and during treatment were collected. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction at 12 weeks.

resultsPatients' mean overall satisfaction score was 4.4 (out of 5). Patients were most satisfied with the medication and ancillary services and indicated strong willingness to refer a substance-abusing friend for the same treatment. Patients were least satisfied with their interactions with other opioid-dependent patients, referrals to Narcotics Anonymous, and the inconvenience of the treatment location. Female gender (beta = .17, P = .04) and non-White ethnicity/race (beta = .17, P = .04) independently predicted patient satisfaction. Patients who received briefer counseling and buprenorphine/naloxone dispensed weekly had greater satisfaction than those whose medication was dispensed thrice weekly (mean difference 4.9, 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 9.80, P = .03).

conclusionsPatients are satisfied with primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone. Providers should consider the identified barriers to patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Office VisitsPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareAdultBuprenorphineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneOpioid-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeBuprenorphineNaloxone

Identifiers

PMID17356993
PMCPMC1824745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.