ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2007
[Treatment of overactive bladder in elderly and old people].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overactive bladder syndrome is a widespread disorder that leads to considerable impairment of quality of life. Besides behavioural therapy (bladder training), methods used in physiotherapy, electrotherapy and instrumental biofeedback have also proved to be successful approaches to treatment. With their good clinical and urodynamic efficacy, substances with antimuscarinic action at M3 receptors in particular and possibly also at M2 receptors have proved successful as first-line agents for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). Despite the frequently high level of suffering and severe impairment of quality of life, however, compliance is poor. Muscarine receptors do have a significant effect on detrusor function, but numerous other mechanisms and receptor entities also play a role. Whether patient acceptance can be significantly increased by the development of selective M-receptor antagonists, improved bladder selectivity or formulating innovations remains to be proven by broad-based clinical testing and independent, comparative, scientific studies. At present, it is not possible to estimate with absolute certainty the risk of an anticholinergic-induced deterioration in cognitive abilities, in particular in elderly individuals. Initial data suggest that primarily M3-selective receptor blockage with darifenacin could be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.