Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17356691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

Factors associated with adherence to anti-hypertensive treatment in Pakistan.

Saman K Hashmi, Maria B Afridi, Kanza Abbas, Rubina A Sajwani, Danish Saleheen, Philippe M Frossard, Mohammad Ishaq, Aisha Ambreen, Usman Ahmad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05467384 (Effect of Amlodipine on the Lipid Profile of Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05467384 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Amlodipine on the Lipid Profile of Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAyub Teaching HospitalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled80ConditionsHypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Cholesterol DepositionArmsAmlodipine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saman K HashmiMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Maria B Afridi
Kanza Abbas
Rubina A Sajwani
Danish Saleheen
Philippe M Frossard
Mohammad Ishaq
Aisha Ambreen
Usman Ahmad
Aga Khan University · PKNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPoor adherence is one of the biggest obstacles in therapeutic control of high blood pressure. The objectives of this study were (i) to measure adherence to antihypertensive therapy in a representative sample of the hypertensive Pakistani population and (ii) to investigate the factors associated with adherence in the studied population. METHODS AND

resultsA cross-sectional study was conducted on a simple random sample of 460 patients at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) and National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, from September 2005-May 2006. Adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), with scores ranging from 0 (non-adherent) to 4 (adherent). In addition to MMAS, patient self-reports about the number of pills taken over a prescribed period were used to estimate adherence as a percentage. AKU Anxiety and Depression Scale (AKU-ADS) was incorporated to find any association between depression and adherence. At a cut-off value of 80%, 77% of the cases were adherent. Upon univariate analyses, increasing age, better awareness and increasing number of pills prescribed significantly improved adherence, while depression showed no association. Significant associations, upon multivariate analyses, included number of drugs that a patient was taking (P<0.02) and whether he/she was taking medication regularly or only for symptomatic relief (P<0.00001).

conclusionsSimilar to what has been reported worldwide, younger age, poor awareness, and symptomatic treatment adversely affected adherence to antihypertensive medication in our population. In contrast, monotherapy reduced adherence, whereas psychosocial factors such as depression showed no association. These findings may be used to identify the subset of population at risk of low adherence who should be targeted for interventions to achieve better blood pressure control and hence prevent complications.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAnalysis of VarianceAntihypertensive AgentsAwarenessConfidentialityCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansHypertensionIncomeInformed ConsentMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID17356691
PMCPMC1805684
OpenAlexW1991495732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.