Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17356186›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2007

The Merci Retrieval System for acute stroke: the Southeast Regional Stroke Center experience.

T G Devlin, B W Baxter, T A Feintuch, N A Desbiens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Achieving faster recanalization times by IA thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: where should we direct our efforts?Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2011
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Recent advances in intra-arterial thrombolysis.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T G DevlinDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee College of Medicine-Chattanooga Unit, 721 Glenwood Drive, Chattanooga, TN 37377, USA. tgdevlin@bellsouth.net
B W Baxter
T A Feintuch
N A Desbiens
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Merci Retrieval System was cleared for use in patients with stroke in August 2004. However, there are few published results of "real world experience" with the device.

methodsWe captured single-center data on 25 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with the Merci Retrieval System according to the MERCI trial except that we treated some patients with tandem proximal carotid and intracranial lesions with carotid angioplasty and stenting and some patients were treated within the 3-hour window.

resultsMedian patient age was 63 years and median initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 18. Isolated M1 or M2 middle cerebral artery lesions occurred in 52%, "carotid T" lesions in 8%, and vertebrobasilar lesions in 8%. Tandem lesions involving proximal carotid and proximal intracranial vessel occurred in 32%, necessitating emergent multilevel treatment including carotid stenting. Median duration from symptom onset to Merci device utilization was 5.2 hours. Successful reperfusion (> or = thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] 2 flow) in the target vessel was obtained in 56% of cases. Statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation between ability to achieve greater than or equal to TIMI 2 flow and good clinical outcome as measured by 3-month NIHSS score, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and mortality (nine out of the 12 without successful reperfusion died compared to none of the 13 with > or =TIMI 2 flow, p < 0.001). Younger age and lower NIHSS score on presentation were also predictors of good clinical outcome at 3 months.

conclusionThese "real world data" demonstrate that the results of the previous MERCI trial can be "independently replicated" at a regional stroke center. Although the results of placebo-controlled trials are still pending, mechanical revascularization has become a critical component of our acute stroke protocol, particularly for severe strokes. Issues still remain regarding recalcitrant lesions and operator experience, which necessitate further clinical testing and device optimization.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedCerebral AngiographyCerebral ArteriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStroke

Identifiers

PMID17356186
OpenAlexW2070353049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.