ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2007
[Laboratory diagnostics for systemic sclerosis].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Organ-specific diagnosis in patients with systemic sclerosis: Recommendations of the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis (DNSS)].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2008Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For systemic sclerosis, laboratory tests can play a supplementary role to clinical investigations, imaging techniques and functional tests. Typical autoantibodies support early diagnosis and help in assigning patients to subgroups of the disease; negative results for antinuclear antibodies suggest exclusion of the diagnosis. To detect organ involvement and comorbidity, the laboratory contributes by clinical chemistry, in certain cases by histopathological findings and by the cytological assessment of broncho-alveolar lavage fluid. Inflammatory parameters are of minor importance. Multiple autoantibody determinations in the course of the disease are not yet helpful. Numerous additional laboratory parameters are of value for investigating pathogenesis, but have not yet been generally introduced into the routine diagnostics of systemic sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17354003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.