Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17352536›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2007

Live hot, die young: transmission distortion in recombination hotspots.

Graham Coop, Simon R Myers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Population Genomics in the Great Apes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of the Yeast Recombination Landscape.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Graham CoopDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Simon R Myers
Broad Institute · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Linkage Disequilibrium Methods For Complex Trait MappingR01HG002772 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRITCHARD, JONATHAN K · 2003 to 2007
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002772NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is strong evidence that hotspots of meiotic recombination in humans are transient features of the genome. For example, hotspot locations are not shared between human and chimpanzee. Biased gene conversion in favor of alleles that locally disrupt hotspots is a possible explanation of the short lifespan of hotspots. We investigate the implications of such a bias on human hotspots and their evolution. Our results demonstrate that gene conversion bias is a sufficiently strong force to produce the observed lack of sharing of intense hotspots between species, although sharing may be much more common for weaker hotspots. We investigate models of how hotspots arise, and find that only models in which hotspot alleles do not initially experience drive are consistent with observations of rather hot hotspots in the human genome. Mutations acting against drive cannot successfully introduce such hotspots into the population, even if there is direct selection for higher recombination rates, such as to ensure correct segregation during meiosis. We explore the impact of hotspot alleles on patterns of haplotype variation, and show that such alleles mask their presence in population genetic data, making them difficult to detect.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAllelesAnimalsChromosome SegregationDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGene ConversionGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationHumansModels, GeneticPan troglodytesRecombination, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID17352536
PMCPMC1817654
OpenAlexW2069681711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.