Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17351845›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2007

The effect of patients' met expectations on consultation outcomes. A study with family medicine residents.

Roger Ruiz-Moral, Luis Angel Pérula de Torres, Inmaculada Jaramillo-Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Patient participation in the discussions of options in Spanish primary care consultations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Met or matched expectations: what accounts for a successful back pain consultation in primary care?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roger Ruiz-MoralCórdoba Teaching Unit of Family Medicine, Andalusia Health Service, COGRAMA Group: Spanish Primary Care Research Network (redIAPP), Córdoba, Spain. roger.ruiz.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es
Luis Angel Pérula de Torres
Inmaculada Jaramillo-Martin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo know the patients' expectations and the fulfillment of these at family medicine consultations by resident doctors and to assess their effect on some consultation outcomes.

designA prospective cohort study.

participantsPatients attending family medicine consultations held by 38 resident doctors: 1,301 eligible patients, 702 filled in all questionnaires. MEASUREMENTS: Before each visit, the patients' expectations about that particular consultation were registered. Right after the visit was over, their perception of several aspects of the communicative interaction with the doctor was measured. Later, patients were interviewed on the phone to know how their expectations had been fulfilled, how satisfied they were about the consultation, how they had followed the doctor's suggestions, if they were going to seek further care for the same cause later, and the evolution of their clinical problem. Logistic regression was the main analysis used.

resultsThe most common expectations were the doctor showing interest and listening (30.5%), getting some information about the diagnosis (16.3%), and sharing problems and doubts (11.1%). The rate of main expectations that were met was 76.5%. Satisfaction with the encounter was associated with the clinical evolution [odds ratio (OR) 2.23; confidence interval (CI): 1.32-3.75], and the fulfilling of the patients' main or two main expectations was significantly related to all the measured outcomes (satisfaction OR 3.51, CI: 1.73-7.8; adherence OR 1.80, CI: 1.11-2.92; clinical evolution OR 1.54, CI: 1.01-2.35; and seeking further care later OR 0.54, CI:0.36-0.81)

conclusionsPatients prioritize expectations of a more general sort when they attend primary care consultations and residents fulfill these acceptably. The fulfillment of expectations seems to affect the studied outcomes more than other factors.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFamily PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID17351845
PMCPMC1824777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.