ArticleBiophysical journal2007
Defining the interface between the C-terminal fragment of alpha-transducin and photoactivated rhodopsin.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tauroursodeoxycholic acid binds to the G-protein site on light activated rhodopsin.Experimental eye research · 2018Article
- The cytoplasmic rhodopsin-protein interface: potential for drug discovery.Current drug targets · 2012Review
- Modulating G-protein coupled receptor/G-protein signal transduction by small molecules suggested by virtual screening.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A novel combination of experimental data and extensive computational modeling was used to explore probable protein-protein interactions between photoactivated rhodopsin (R*) and experimentally determined R*-bound structures of the C-terminal fragment of alpha-transducin (Gt(alpha)(340-350)) and its analogs. Rather than using one set of loop structures derived from the dark-adapted rhodopsin state, R* was modeled in this study using various energetically feasible sets of intracellular loop (IC loop) conformations proposed previously in another study. The R*-bound conformation of Gt(alpha)(340-350) and several analogs were modeled using experimental transferred nuclear Overhauser effect data derived upon binding R*. Gt(alpha)(340-350) and its analogs were docked to various conformations of the intracellular loops, followed by optimization of side-chain spatial positions in both R* and Gt(alpha)(340-350) to obtain low-energy complexes. Finally, the structures of each complex were subjected to energy minimization using the OPLS/GBSA force field. The resulting residue-residue contacts at the interface between R* and Gt(alpha)(340-350) were validated by comparison with available experimental data, primarily from mutational studies. Computational modeling performed for Gt(alpha)(340-350) and its analogs when bound to R* revealed a consensus of general residue-residue interactions, necessary for efficient complex formation between R* and its Gt(alpha) recognition motif.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.