ReviewJournal of neurology2007
Strategies for achieving and monitoring myelin repair.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamins E and D3 attenuate demyelination and potentiate remyelination processes of hippocampal formation of rats following local injection of ethidium bromide.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2010Article
- Tissue-specific MR imaging in multiple sclerosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of factors more or less unique to multiple sclerosis have suggested that this disease may be particularly amenable to cell-based reparative therapies. The relatively focussed damage to oligodendrocytes and myelin at least in early disease implies that only a single population of cells need be replaced-and that the daunting problem of re-establishing connectivity does not apply. The presence of significant though partial spontaneous myelin repair in multiple sclerosis proves there to be no insurmountable barrier to remyelination intrinsic to the CNS: the therapeutic challenge becomes that of supplementing this spontaneous process, rather than creating repair de novo. Finally, the large body of available knowledge concerning the biology of oligodendrocytes, and the success of experimental myelin repair, have allowed cautious optimism that future prospects for such therapies are not unrealistic. Nonetheless, particular and significant problems are not hard to list: the occurrence of innumerable lesions scattered throughout the CNS, axon loss, astrocytosis, and a continuing inflammatory process, to name but a few. Here we review the progress and the areas where difficulties have yet to be resolved in efforts to develop remyelinating therapies for multiple sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17345032What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.