Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17345032›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2007

Strategies for achieving and monitoring myelin repair.

Claire Rice, Neil Scolding

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tissue-specific MR imaging in multiple sclerosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire RiceDepartment of Neurology, University of Bristol, Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, BS16 1LE, UK.
Neil Scolding

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of factors more or less unique to multiple sclerosis have suggested that this disease may be particularly amenable to cell-based reparative therapies. The relatively focussed damage to oligodendrocytes and myelin at least in early disease implies that only a single population of cells need be replaced-and that the daunting problem of re-establishing connectivity does not apply. The presence of significant though partial spontaneous myelin repair in multiple sclerosis proves there to be no insurmountable barrier to remyelination intrinsic to the CNS: the therapeutic challenge becomes that of supplementing this spontaneous process, rather than creating repair de novo. Finally, the large body of available knowledge concerning the biology of oligodendrocytes, and the success of experimental myelin repair, have allowed cautious optimism that future prospects for such therapies are not unrealistic. Nonetheless, particular and significant problems are not hard to list: the occurrence of innumerable lesions scattered throughout the CNS, axon loss, astrocytosis, and a continuing inflammatory process, to name but a few. Here we review the progress and the areas where difficulties have yet to be resolved in efforts to develop remyelinating therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansMultiple SclerosisMyelin SheathNerve RegenerationOligodendrogliaWound Healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.