Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17342515›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2007

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefpirome in critically ill patients against Gram-negative bacteria.

Juliana F Roos, Jeffrey Lipman, Carl M J Kirkpatrick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliana F RoosSchool of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. jroos@pharmacy.uq.edu.au.
Jeffrey LipmanAnaesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Queensland and Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane Hospital, 4029, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Carl M J KirkpatrickSchool of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a population pharmacokinetics model for cefpirome in ICU patients, to assess pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profiles vs. MIC distribution of likely ICU pathogens, and to assess their expected cumulative fraction of response (CFR). DESIGN AND

settingProspective observational study in a multidisciplinary ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsTwelve patients received 2g cefpirome intravenously over 12h. Thirteen blood samples were taken on two occasions. Demographic and creatinine clearance data were collected. Based on the final covariate model obtained using NONMEM, Monte Carlo simulations were undertaken to simulate free-drug concentrations for two administration methods: intermittent bolus administration (IBA) and continuous infusion (CI) with a loading dose of 0.5 g. Concentration-time profiles were evaluated by the probability of achieving free-drug concentrations above the MIC for more than 65% of dosing interval. Using MIC distributions from the EUCAST programme the CFR for each method was evaluated. A three-compartment model with zero-order input best described the concentration-time data. The CFR for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. was greater than 97% in all IBA and CI doses but for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. achieved target concentrations of 56% and 46%, respectively. High-dose CI cefpirome (6g/day) for P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. was required to achieve CFR of 89%.

conclusionMeasured creatinine clearance appears to be a good marker of cefpirome clearance and potentially could be used to individualise cefpirome therapy. When given as IBA or CI for E. coli and Klebsiella spp., cefpirome should be successful. Cefpirome fails to achieve the bactericidal target even when administered at high-doses such as 6g/day for P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Prospective clinical studies are needed to conclusively validate these findings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefpiromeCephalosporinsCreatinineCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefpiromeCephalosporinsCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID17342515
OpenAlexW2078009347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.